While Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Vice President William Lai (賴清德) remains ahead in the polls and the candidates for the opposition parties — the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party — have yet to agree on a proposed “blue-white alliance,” anything could happen in the presidential race.
Whichever party wins in January next year, it must have a robust foreign policy, given the fraught geopolitical dynamics, both globally and regionally.
Opposition parties criticize the government’s foreign policy, but must take account of the geopolitical circumstances that have changed enormously in the past five or so years, and little has been a result of Taiwan’s actions.
The KMT must recognize that the international situation is very different from the one former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) knew when he left office eight years ago.
In this region alone, countries are realigning and reassessing priorities, including Japan, the two Koreas, China, Russia, the Philippines, Australia and India.
Should it win, the KMT would need to engage with international dynamics it did not consider before, let go of its skepticism of the US and Japan and open up to engagement with India, a major international player that is increasingly important in the region.
Japan has been a friend to Taiwan, especially since the administrations of the late Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe. Tokyo’s interest in maintaining peace in the Taiwan Strait is not born predominantly of friendship: It is due to hard geopolitical reality. Again, the changes in the dynamic for Japan are not because of Japan’s actions, but because of an increasingly aggressive China.
Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida intends to double defense spending to 2 percent of GDP within five years and is actively looking to deepen defense cooperation with regional allies such as India, Australia, New Zealand and the Philippines.
Kishida visited Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr in Manila on Friday to discuss tightening security ties and strengthening their trilateral partnership with the US.
Just as China is the main driving force behind Japan’s moves, India also finds itself performing a balancing act amid its relations with China and Taiwan.
Delhi stands to benefit greatly from the continuation of the status quo in the Taiwan Strait, and as a member of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue with partners Japan, the US and Australia, is expected to ensure Taiwan’s continued sovereignty.
India enjoys good relations and economic ties with Taiwan at the governmental and parliamentary levels, although this could be improved. At the civil society level, Indians have a favorable image of Taiwan.
Beijing’s aggressive moves and unfounded claims on Indian territory complicate Delhi’s relations with China and provide a military aspect to its interests in maintaining peace in the Taiwan Strait.
China would be much strengthened if it successfully invaded Taiwan, enabling it to focus its attention and resources on its Himalayan border with India.
Delhi is also concerned that if the People’s Liberation Army were unsuccessful in invading Taiwan, Beijing would seek to restore its military reputation by gaining control of Indian territory at the border instead.
India, then, could be a powerful, interested partner in helping Taiwan’s incoming administration deter Chinese aggression in the Taiwan Strait.
Delhi remains wary of provoking Beijing by strengthening ties with Taiwan. However, much could be done at the parliamentary level through mutual visits by Indian and Taiwanese lawmakers, and the new government in Taipei should be willing to actively encourage this.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS