There have been media reports that the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) might include Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) — the chairwoman of the Taiwan New Residents Development Association — in the party’s nomination list of legislators-at-large. However, the media also reported that Xu used to serve as a Chinese government cadre, and this has caused much uproar.
Article 21 of the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) says: “Except otherwise provided for in any other law, any of the people of the Mainland Area permitted to enter into the Taiwan Area may not register itself [sic] as candidate for any public office, serve in the government, educational institutions or state enterprises, or organize any political party unless it has had a household registration in the Taiwan Area for at least 10 years.”
Apart from having a household registration in the Taiwan Area for at least 10 years, Xu must also meet the requirement “otherwise provided for in any other law,” which in her case refers to the Nationality Act (國籍法).
Article 20 of the Nationality Act says: “A national of the ROC who acquires the nationality of another country has no right to hold government offices of the ROC.”
Although Xu does have a household registration in Taiwan, she has failed to show a “certificate of loss of nationality” from China to this day. By comparison, independent presidential candidate Terry Gou’s (郭台銘) running mate, Tammy Lai (賴佩霞), confirmed that she has received her “certificate of loss of nationality” from the US. Xu should have issued a certificate to prove that she has given up her Chinese citizenship in accordance with the Nationality Act.
The Council of Grand Justices has previously stated the conditions under which Republic of China law specifically restricts Chinese nationals from holding public office in Taiwan are “constitutional” for the sake of maintaining a free and democratic constitutional order.
Constitutional Interpretation No. 618 states: “No person from the Mainland Area who has been permitted to enter into the Taiwan Area may serve as a public functionary unless he or she has had a household registration in the Taiwan Area for at least 10 years... The said provision is an extraordinary one with reasonable and justifiable objectives in that a public functionary, once appointed and employed by the State, shall be entrusted with official duties by the State under public law and shall owe a duty of loyalty to the State, that the public functionary shall not only obey the laws and orders but also take every action and adopt every policy possible that he or she considers to be in the best interests of the State by keeping in mind the overall interests of the State, since the exercise of his or her official duties will involve the public authorities of the State; and, further, the security of the Taiwan Area, the welfare of the people of Taiwan, as well as the constitutional structure.”
In other words, if someone holding foreign citizenship wants to run for public office in Taiwan, they must comply with the Nationality Act that prohibits possessing dual nationality.
However, if Chinese nationals wants to run for public office, they must comply with not only the prohibition on dual nationality, but also with the “10 years of household registration” stipulated in the related law.
Therefore, if Xu wants to become a legislator-at-large, she must issue a certificate of loss of Chinese nationality first.
Huang Di-ying is a lawyer.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s