China is losing influence in the South Pacific following a reduction of its spending in the region, The Associated Press reported on Tuesday.
South Pacific countries that rely on aid are increasingly rejecting Chinese funding in favor of deals from Australia or other US allies, while China has been shifting aid to its own regional allies, the report said.
This follows efforts by the US, Australia and other countries to respond to concerns over China’s growing presence in the region, which culminated last year when China established a security pact with the Solomon Islands.
However, developments this year have largely put those concerns to rest. The US has renewed its Compacts of Free Association with Micronesia, Palau and the Marshall Islands, and Palau has agreed to let the US build a base there.
The US also signed two security agreements with the largest South Pacific nation, Papua New Guinea (PNG), following a visit there by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in May. Those agreements will give the US access to some military bases, and the second will give it access to satellite data and allow it to board PNG vessels to counter illegal fishing and trafficking.
Along with an agreement made with the Philippines early in the year that gives the US access to some bases in that country, Washington has firmly secured its influence over the first and second island chains.
Now would be an opportune time for the US to hold large-scale drills in the South China Sea and Oceania with Taiwan and other allies in the region. The drills in the South China Sea could involve landings on islands administered by Taiwan, Vietnam, the Philippines and Indonesia, while those in Oceania could involve bases that the US would have access to in the event of a conflict in the region.
This would send a clear message to China about the scale of a response it would face if it tried to engage any of these countries in warfare.
Countries in the region must also cooperate on conducting regular patrols of the South China Sea and should set clear boundaries to prevent Chinese aggression, such as that which has been experienced by Philippine supply vessels that have been obstructed by the Chinese Coast Guard. The South China Sea, despite being so poorly named, does not belong to China — and if that is not made clear to China now, it will only become harder to enforce freedom of navigation.
The Chinese Coast Guard and People’s Liberation Army regularly come within unsafe distances of foreign military vessels and aircraft operating in international areas in the region. China would be less likely to be so aggressive if countries always patrolled together and if surveillance was accompanied by military might.
Toward this end, countries should cooperate to fortify military installations on islands in the South China Sea not occupied by China, equipping them with high-tech radar equipment, long-range missiles and ports large enough to accommodate destroyers.
It has been argued that the Indo-Pacific region needs its own NATO. Such an alliance should be considered for first and second island chain countries. Just as NATO protects its members from Russian aggression, so could such an alliance in the Indo-Pacific protect its members from Chinese aggression.
If a clear resolve to cooperate on defense and the protection of respective sovereignty is not expressed by countries in the region, China would seek to sow divisions and turn friends against each other.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s