China is losing influence in the South Pacific following a reduction of its spending in the region, The Associated Press reported on Tuesday.
South Pacific countries that rely on aid are increasingly rejecting Chinese funding in favor of deals from Australia or other US allies, while China has been shifting aid to its own regional allies, the report said.
This follows efforts by the US, Australia and other countries to respond to concerns over China’s growing presence in the region, which culminated last year when China established a security pact with the Solomon Islands.
However, developments this year have largely put those concerns to rest. The US has renewed its Compacts of Free Association with Micronesia, Palau and the Marshall Islands, and Palau has agreed to let the US build a base there.
The US also signed two security agreements with the largest South Pacific nation, Papua New Guinea (PNG), following a visit there by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in May. Those agreements will give the US access to some military bases, and the second will give it access to satellite data and allow it to board PNG vessels to counter illegal fishing and trafficking.
Along with an agreement made with the Philippines early in the year that gives the US access to some bases in that country, Washington has firmly secured its influence over the first and second island chains.
Now would be an opportune time for the US to hold large-scale drills in the South China Sea and Oceania with Taiwan and other allies in the region. The drills in the South China Sea could involve landings on islands administered by Taiwan, Vietnam, the Philippines and Indonesia, while those in Oceania could involve bases that the US would have access to in the event of a conflict in the region.
This would send a clear message to China about the scale of a response it would face if it tried to engage any of these countries in warfare.
Countries in the region must also cooperate on conducting regular patrols of the South China Sea and should set clear boundaries to prevent Chinese aggression, such as that which has been experienced by Philippine supply vessels that have been obstructed by the Chinese Coast Guard. The South China Sea, despite being so poorly named, does not belong to China — and if that is not made clear to China now, it will only become harder to enforce freedom of navigation.
The Chinese Coast Guard and People’s Liberation Army regularly come within unsafe distances of foreign military vessels and aircraft operating in international areas in the region. China would be less likely to be so aggressive if countries always patrolled together and if surveillance was accompanied by military might.
Toward this end, countries should cooperate to fortify military installations on islands in the South China Sea not occupied by China, equipping them with high-tech radar equipment, long-range missiles and ports large enough to accommodate destroyers.
It has been argued that the Indo-Pacific region needs its own NATO. Such an alliance should be considered for first and second island chain countries. Just as NATO protects its members from Russian aggression, so could such an alliance in the Indo-Pacific protect its members from Chinese aggression.
If a clear resolve to cooperate on defense and the protection of respective sovereignty is not expressed by countries in the region, China would seek to sow divisions and turn friends against each other.
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned