The US has seen big increases in government expenditure and a growing budget deficit due to the leftist big-government policies of US President Joe Biden’s administration, plus the cost of supporting Ukraine in its war against Russia. This situation has caused endless disputes over the federal budget and other fiscal issues.
To prevent a constitutional and fiscal crisis, then-speaker of the US House of Representatives Kevin McCarthy arranged some compromises with Biden, which upset hardliners in the Republican Party, while the Democratic Party turned around and added to the attacks on McCarthy, culminating in his removal from the post of house speaker on Oct. 3.
Some people in Taiwan who hold US-skeptic or anti-US views criticized and ridiculed the situation, while failing to understand that order in the midst of chaos is normal in a democratic country.
McCarthy was in favor of building the US’ military strength, so now that he is no longer the speaker, would it affect the US’ willingness and ability to resist China? It is a blessing in disguise for Taiwan, as the new speaker supports Taiwan even more strongly than McCarthy did.
McCarthy’s removal was followed by a period of bickering as several candidates failed to win the backing of the majority of representatives. The position of house speaker was vacant for 22 days, with Republican Representative Patrick McHenry serving as acting speaker.
However, a dark horse eventually emerged in the form of 51-year-old Mike Johnson, a relative newcomer who was elected as a federal representative in 2016. Johnson was elected the new speaker on Oct. 25.
Johnson is a member of the Congressional Taiwan Caucus and a co-signer of Taiwan-friendly bills such as the Taiwan International Solidarity Act of 2021.
He has always called for the US to be prepared to prevent China from invading Taiwan. Now that he has become the house speaker, he is sure to go on promoting the US’ strategic priority of resisting China and protecting Taiwan.
Many anti-US and US-skeptic commentators assert that the US cannot fight a war on three fronts involving Russia versus Ukraine, Israel versus Hamas and a conflict in the Taiwan Strait. However, this is quite out of touch with reality. The US has only been giving Ukraine financial assistance and weapons to fight Russia, while Israel is more than capable of crushing Hamas on its own. More importantly, the US’ top strategic priority in the medium to long term is still to contain China, so it would not back down from supporting Taiwan.
Johnson is a devout Christian who abides by the spirit of his faith. He has close ties with US Christian groups such as Answers in Genesis, the Louisiana Family Forum, the Alliance Defending Freedom and Focus on the Family, and he holds firm positions on related issues such as opposing abortion and disagreeing with unlimited calls for gender diversity.
Taiwan has long embraced European and American leftist ideas, with most politicians and opinion leaders believing that “progressive” ideas are universal values. However, it is important to understand that most countries in the world are divided into left and right. Leftists are not the only ones to think their ideas are universal values — right wingers think the same about their own ideas.
When conversing with a staunch friend of Taiwan like Johnson, the topic of same-sex rights could be left out. If Taiwan wants to get along with both left and right in the world, it will also need a deeper understanding of conservative thought.
Tommy Lin is president of the Formosa Republican Association.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022