When it comes to the issue of retaining more people aged 65 or older in the workforce, the public usually focuses on how to encourage already retired elders to return to work. The discussion is therefore on filling vacancies, flexible work schedules and training courses. It is also curious that people re-entering the job market are expected to work in service sectors only.
Is it true that middle-aged and senior workers cannot acquire new skills? Is it really the case that they are only suitable for service industry jobs, which are considered relatively easy? Are they only fit for filling up vacancies in a passive way? Considering the situations in Japan and South Korea, Taiwan should pay more attention to retired elders’ work experiences. The government should also work more on encouraging senior workers to stay longer at their jobs and extend their time frames of retirement.
In Taiwan, along with an aging population, the fertility rate is seriously declining, and such a tendency is becoming irreversible. According to a report by the National Development Council, Taiwan is expected to be a super-aged society by 2025, in which 20 percent of the population is aged 65 or older. The “demographic dividend” will soon end, and by 2034, people over the age of 50 are expected to account for half of the population. Taiwan would start accumulating a demographic debt. At that time, the working-age population (aged 15 to 64) would decrease further, while more seniors would have to continue working to secure life necessities. Many would become overworked elders.
The Middle-aged and Elderly Employment Promotion Act (中高齡者及高齡者就業促進法) focuses on the prohibition of age discrimination, specifying that “the employer shall not impose differential treatment on the senior and middle-aged persons and the elders.” However, measures to postpone the retirement age so that elders could work longer have not been implemented. This should be addressed immediately to retain senior workers in the workforce.
We can and should learn from others. Take Japan and South Korea for example. In Japan, the retirement age is 70, and a senior employment system has been implemented to ensure job opportunities for elderly workers. What is worth considering in this system is that it takes into account the health conditions of the elderly. Hence, their workloads and work hours are as flexible as could be. Senior workers would work no more than 10 days per month and no more than 20 hours per week. This is to ensure that seniors work in an environment where they could feel happy and fulfilled.
In South Korea, the government encourages employers to hire senior workers by means of wage reductions and mandatory employment. Employers and employees are supposed to negotiate with one another to reduce wages and work hours year by year prior to retirement. Meanwhile, the government would subsidize employers to hire senior workers, and it is mandatory for an enterprise of more than 300 employees to hire a certain percentage of seniors.
For many countries around the world, it has become imperative to keep seniors in the workforce. We should recognize that the elderly can contribute to industries. The government must work on implementing a system that would allow senior workers to postpone their retirement more easily.
A work model that promotes the collaboration of youth and seniors should also be highlighted and advanced, making sure that different generations can work together while facilitating the passing on of work experience. That way, the workforce in Taiwan can be regenerated and re-enlivened.
Chen Chien-hsien is the chairperson of the Taitung County Sports Development Foundation and an assistant professor in Meiho University’s Department of Social Work.
Translated by Emma Liu
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS