Last Saturday, a large crowd, many waving rainbow flags and dressed in flamboyant costumes and clothing, marched through Taipei in a raucous celebration of LGBTQ+ equality and diversity in East Asia’s largest Pride march.
This year’s parade was aimed at “recognizing the diversity of every person, and respecting and accepting different gender identities,” said the Taiwan Rainbow Civil Association, the event’s organizer.
People might wonder why there is still a need to hold a march every year since Taiwan already became the first country in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage in 2019.
The reason is fairly simple: People are forgetful creatures. Any advancement or reform could easily backslide in a democratic society if left “unattended.”
A case in point is when the US Supreme Court declared same-sex marriage legal in all 50 states during former US president Barack Obama’s administration. People thought things were looking up for LGBTQ+ Americans, yet things took a dark turn when Donald Trump was elected US president. Trump introduced new policies unfriendly to LGBTQ+ people and reversed nearly every policy Obama had implemented.
To prevent such a relapse in Taiwan, the annual parade serves as a reminder that rights of equality and inclusion are hard-earned achievements.
After same-sex marriage between citizens became legal in Taiwan, society has taken a step further in understanding LGBTQ+ Taiwanese, yet there are still many aspects that leave much to be desired. For one, media outlets tend to vilify the costumes of people in the Pride parade. There are still stereotypes, false impressions and bias aimed at them, such as a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) city councilor blaming the declining birthrate on same-sex marriages or how LGBTQ+ people undermine or go against traditional cultural practices of filial piety.
The annual pride is held with the aim of reducing bigotry and stereotypes. What matters is that different groups “agree to disagree” after communication and find a way forward together instead of letting misunderstandings and ill will get in the way.
As the nation gears up for the Jan. 13 presidential and legislative elections, gender or sexuality-based attacks on candidates could also rise. Infamous examples include the KMT accusing President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) of being a “lesbian” or former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Shih Ming-teh (施明德) calling on Tsai to clarify her sexual orientation.
So far, only a few non-heterosexual candidates have been elected as representatives, which shows how hard it is for LGBTQ+ people to participate in the current political environment. Political parties should encourage more LGBTQ+ candidates to participate in politics to promote gender equality, and offer an open platform for LGBTQ+ people and discussion of anti-bigotry issues.
It is worth mentioning that out of the four presidential candidates, only the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) presidential candidate, Vice President William Lai (賴清德), attended the parade. The other three candidates all gave reasons for their absence, but when it comes to politics, there is no such thing as “excuses,” there is only an endorsement or not.
Pride is more than just an event that celebrates diversity, respect and inclusion — it is also a representation of Taiwan’s openness and equality. The public cannot afford to forget that same-sex marriage is the achievement of people’s collective efforts, toil and daring. It is up to the public to make the right choice for the presidency next year so as to keep that invaluable right alive for the next four years.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS