Last Saturday, a large crowd, many waving rainbow flags and dressed in flamboyant costumes and clothing, marched through Taipei in a raucous celebration of LGBTQ+ equality and diversity in East Asia’s largest Pride march.
This year’s parade was aimed at “recognizing the diversity of every person, and respecting and accepting different gender identities,” said the Taiwan Rainbow Civil Association, the event’s organizer.
People might wonder why there is still a need to hold a march every year since Taiwan already became the first country in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage in 2019.
The reason is fairly simple: People are forgetful creatures. Any advancement or reform could easily backslide in a democratic society if left “unattended.”
A case in point is when the US Supreme Court declared same-sex marriage legal in all 50 states during former US president Barack Obama’s administration. People thought things were looking up for LGBTQ+ Americans, yet things took a dark turn when Donald Trump was elected US president. Trump introduced new policies unfriendly to LGBTQ+ people and reversed nearly every policy Obama had implemented.
To prevent such a relapse in Taiwan, the annual parade serves as a reminder that rights of equality and inclusion are hard-earned achievements.
After same-sex marriage between citizens became legal in Taiwan, society has taken a step further in understanding LGBTQ+ Taiwanese, yet there are still many aspects that leave much to be desired. For one, media outlets tend to vilify the costumes of people in the Pride parade. There are still stereotypes, false impressions and bias aimed at them, such as a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) city councilor blaming the declining birthrate on same-sex marriages or how LGBTQ+ people undermine or go against traditional cultural practices of filial piety.
The annual pride is held with the aim of reducing bigotry and stereotypes. What matters is that different groups “agree to disagree” after communication and find a way forward together instead of letting misunderstandings and ill will get in the way.
As the nation gears up for the Jan. 13 presidential and legislative elections, gender or sexuality-based attacks on candidates could also rise. Infamous examples include the KMT accusing President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) of being a “lesbian” or former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Shih Ming-teh (施明德) calling on Tsai to clarify her sexual orientation.
So far, only a few non-heterosexual candidates have been elected as representatives, which shows how hard it is for LGBTQ+ people to participate in the current political environment. Political parties should encourage more LGBTQ+ candidates to participate in politics to promote gender equality, and offer an open platform for LGBTQ+ people and discussion of anti-bigotry issues.
It is worth mentioning that out of the four presidential candidates, only the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) presidential candidate, Vice President William Lai (賴清德), attended the parade. The other three candidates all gave reasons for their absence, but when it comes to politics, there is no such thing as “excuses,” there is only an endorsement or not.
Pride is more than just an event that celebrates diversity, respect and inclusion — it is also a representation of Taiwan’s openness and equality. The public cannot afford to forget that same-sex marriage is the achievement of people’s collective efforts, toil and daring. It is up to the public to make the right choice for the presidency next year so as to keep that invaluable right alive for the next four years.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS