Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has come under fire amid reports that the party has selected Xu Chunying (徐春鶯), a Chinese immigrant and an advocate for foreign-born spouses, who was allegedly a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) cadre, for its list of legislator-at-large nominees.
To justify his selection, Ko said that as more than 1 million Taiwanese residents have links to Chinese spouses, they have a right to be represented and should not be treated like enemies.
However, Ko’s nomination would throw Chinese spouses in Taiwan in greater fear.
As a former CCP cadre, Xu would have had close connections with the Chinese government and the CCP. Add the fact that she has maintained frequent contacts with Chinese political organizations.
If Xu invites or visits any Chinese spouses, asking them to join her organization — the New Residents Development Association — they would not dare turn down her invitation or reject assigned tasks. This is out of fear that they have no idea if Xu has the CCP’s backing or not. Chinese who have immigrated to Taiwan might fear for their families’ safety in China, worried that their families might be in danger if they refuse to comply with Xu’s orders.
Chinese spouses who came to Taiwan seeking love and starting a new family here are also looking for a way out, away from China’s clutches. Xu’s actions and potential rise to further power would only send their lives into disarray and render their efforts to escape China futile.
Ko nominating Xu is aimed at not only commandeering the support of families with Chinese spouses, but also sending a message to China that Ko is more capable than the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of proposing policies that cater to the CCP’s interests.
By doing this, he is soliciting China’s support to back him in the “blue-white alliance” and see him as the leader of the anti-Democratic Progress Party coalition.
As another party with the same agenda in mind would also be vying for these ballots, these sycophantic moves could undermine national security, putting Taiwan in grave danger amid rising tensions across the Taiwan Strait.
As Ko and the TPP are only seeking their own interests instead of bringing benefit to people or thinking of national welfare, Taiwanese should not hand the presidency to such a character in next year’s election.
Lin Shiou-jeng is chair of Chung Chou University of Science and Technology’s marketing and logistics management department.
Translated by Rita Wang
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s