Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has come under fire amid reports that the party has selected Xu Chunying (徐春鶯), a Chinese immigrant and an advocate for foreign-born spouses, who was allegedly a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) cadre, for its list of legislator-at-large nominees.
To justify his selection, Ko said that as more than 1 million Taiwanese residents have links to Chinese spouses, they have a right to be represented and should not be treated like enemies.
However, Ko’s nomination would throw Chinese spouses in Taiwan in greater fear.
As a former CCP cadre, Xu would have had close connections with the Chinese government and the CCP. Add the fact that she has maintained frequent contacts with Chinese political organizations.
If Xu invites or visits any Chinese spouses, asking them to join her organization — the New Residents Development Association — they would not dare turn down her invitation or reject assigned tasks. This is out of fear that they have no idea if Xu has the CCP’s backing or not. Chinese who have immigrated to Taiwan might fear for their families’ safety in China, worried that their families might be in danger if they refuse to comply with Xu’s orders.
Chinese spouses who came to Taiwan seeking love and starting a new family here are also looking for a way out, away from China’s clutches. Xu’s actions and potential rise to further power would only send their lives into disarray and render their efforts to escape China futile.
Ko nominating Xu is aimed at not only commandeering the support of families with Chinese spouses, but also sending a message to China that Ko is more capable than the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of proposing policies that cater to the CCP’s interests.
By doing this, he is soliciting China’s support to back him in the “blue-white alliance” and see him as the leader of the anti-Democratic Progress Party coalition.
As another party with the same agenda in mind would also be vying for these ballots, these sycophantic moves could undermine national security, putting Taiwan in grave danger amid rising tensions across the Taiwan Strait.
As Ko and the TPP are only seeking their own interests instead of bringing benefit to people or thinking of national welfare, Taiwanese should not hand the presidency to such a character in next year’s election.
Lin Shiou-jeng is chair of Chung Chou University of Science and Technology’s marketing and logistics management department.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of