Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) emerged on Monday afternoon from a meeting with Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) with news that the two have reached a partial agreement on cooperation for January’s presidential election.
The two parties have agreed to work together to maximize their legislative seats, but their drawn-out horse trading has yet to bear fruit on how to decide who becomes the proposed alliance’s presidential candidate.
Only Chu knows exactly what his end game is, while Ko is looking for assurances that no one party would end up with more than half of the legislative seats. The TPP has no chance of achieving that, and Chu could only promise that the KMT would work constructively with other opposition parties.
It is clear that Ko and New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the KMT’s presidential candidate, need each other if they are going to have a chance to beat Vice President William Lai (賴清德), the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) presidential candidate. According to the latest poll by online news outlet my-formosa.com, Lai has maintained his healthy lead, although it has slipped 6.3 percentage points to 33.7 percent in a race with Hou, who is now at 24.6 percent, up 2.2 percentage points from last month, and Ko has gone up 2.3 percentage points to 23.9 percent.
Things could change if Hou and Ko get their act together and share a ticket. A Ko-Hou or a Hou-Ko pairing would beat a prospective ticket of Lai and Representative to the US Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) with 47.4 percent to 35.3 percent and 46.1 percent to 36.8 percent respectively.
The election is still months away, and it is by no means clear that a blue-white alliance could beat Lai. When it comes to politics, one plus one does not necessarily equal two. While some swing voters might think that a TPP-KMT ticket would be stronger, others might be turned off by the horse trading. That said, Lai also needs to take a look at how his figures have fallen.
Ko and Hou have said that they are not overly concerned about who is first on the ticket, and yet they are quibbling and playing a game of brinkmanship.
So why quibble? If it is true that neither is overly concerned who is top of the ticket, and realizing that they need to cooperate to win, insisting on the correct method for choosing the candidate must be a principled stand. Principled stands are rare in party politics. It can therefore be assumed that they are very much concerned who is on top.
Chu does not care whether Hou leads the ticket or not. Chu thinks he has Ko under his thumb, and might be content with being able to jettison either man whatever the outcome. Hou would be weakened by only being vice president and the KMT could let go of him in the next election, while Ko could be a scapegoat and let go with little cost to Chu or the KMT.
On the other hand, Ko would get power, despite being less experienced than Chu. However, he would be a hostage to a KMT legislative majority.
Ko might want to show that he offers something beyond the blue-green dichotomy of pro-China/pro-Taiwan politics, but this drawn-out horse trading has revealed his true colors.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS