China’s National People’s Congress passed the Patriotic Education Law (愛國主義教育法) to bolster patriotic education for children and families, leading to a vehement backlash on the Internet. Even though patriotism should be a good thing, when the supposedly voluntary sentiment becomes “compulsory” and regulated by law, it only underscores the sad truth — China has no confidence in its political regime and so needs repression and ideological control to keep Chinese and their thinking and actions under the thumb of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
One of the most ludicrous points is to incorporate Taiwan into the law, using the opportunity to realize “unification,” which only accentuates the absurdity and frivolity of the law.
The law has been introduced to reinforce the CCP regime, seize control of people’s minds and boost the party’s control.
Many other governments have let their people become masters of the nation, establishing systems based on the public will and using democracy to unite people. In this way, people naturally develop a sense of patriotism.
China intends to use cultural history to unite people, yet this kind of narrow ruling not only fails to unite people, but triggers the very opposite effect — Chinese know that the CCP is coercing them to love the party.
Culture is humanity’s greatest asset, not a tool for the CCP to monopolize. The CCP’s crackdown on human rights and its ruthless governance do not put it in any position to talk about culture, let alone tradition, ethics or morality.
The CCP does not have the public will behind it — the party uses pressure and fear to control the people without sparing a thought for their welfare. Many high-level Chinese officials have bought real estate in the US and sent their families abroad, and now seek a law that breathes down people’s necks under the banner of patriotism.
The cold, hard truth is that there is no love or patriotism in China’s ruling class and the state apparatus has become a plaything for them to abuse.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Shuili Junior High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Rita Wang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS