A dispute over the government expropriation of land in Taoyuan’s Longtan District (龍潭) for the expansion of Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區) underscores the severe scarcity of industrial land in northern Taiwan and the dangers of hasty policymaking, which could undermine the nation’s industrial development. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) planned to build its next-generation chip fab on the land, but amid escalating resident protests, the world’s biggest contract chipmaker last week said it was “no longer considering establishing a site” in Longtan.
The opposition TSMC faced at home differs starkly from the support it has received in Japan and Europe in terms of funding and land acquisition.
A group representing residents of Longtan yesterday protested against the government’s plan to expropriate their land to create the new industrial zone in Hsinchu Science Park. Residents demanded that the government scrap the project entirely, saying that they were being bullied as part of a land grab. Some residents said they worried they would be unable to afford a new home even with government compensation.
The Hsinchu Science Park Administration said it would re-evaluate the Longtan phase 3 expansion, adding that all the expropriation procedures were legal. The industrial development agency has offered to acquire the land based on market value, as the phase 1 and 2 sections of the park have already been fully utilized. The administration last month scaled back 20 percent of the land use after resident protests, which more than halved the number of affected households from 162 to 77.
The administration’s response failed to make peace with upset Longtan residents or convince TSMC to build in the expansion. A lack of respect and transparent communication have has been the crux of the disputes. Starting in October last year, when the government first talked about the Longtan development, most residents were unaware that their homes or farmland would be expropriated for the project. For those affected and for the public in general, the news came out of the blue. The government told reporters that this “pilot project” had been in discussions for three years before it was publicly disclosed.
The Hsinchu Science Park Administration in December last year announced that TSMC would build the new fab to make its cutting-edge 1.4-nanometer chips on 158.59 hectares of land, 90 percent of which is privately owned. Proponents of the project have said it would create about 5,900 jobs and generate up to NT$650 billion (US$20.05 billion) in production value per year.
The stealthy planning of the expansion angered residents. They said they felt like the government was encroaching on their property and rights. Some who have lived on their property for generations said they would fight the government for as long as it takes.
Deadlocks would neither help the community nor benefit companies. It is the government’s responsibility to help the economy grow and accommodate business expansion, especially for the semiconductor industry, which has become strategically important to Taiwan’s economy and national defense, with some calling it a “silicon shield.” Creating jobs and protecting society are also the government’s responsibilities. An industrial land shortage is a long-running issue that would not be easily solved, but any land expropriation should be fair, sound and necessary. On top of that, it requires clear, timely communication to make it successful.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS