Short-term support needed
Taiwan has been an aging society for some time. The government has established a long-term care system, providing services and facilities to take care of the elderly and the disabled. The government should also provide assistance for short-term care, which is usually more urgently needed and expensive.
In an emergency room or operating room, the patients’ family members, relatives or friends are always there, waiting anxiously. They worry about how they could cope with the sudden changes as a result of the patients’ injuries or illness.
Their lives are very likely to be disrupted due to their financial circumstances and the urgent need to take care of the patients. Their work and careers might be affected as well. They need to be at the hospital to take care of the patients, and they have to take days off from work. It is unfortunate that some might have to quit their jobs because of company regulations.
The costs of a daily intensive care unit or surgical treatment are astronomical. When the patient is transferred to a general ward, the nursing fees are a few thousand New Taiwan dollars per day (The going rate is between NT$2,500 and NT$3,500 for a 24-hour caregiver). There are also basic medical expenses to be counted. For everything, one would have to spend more than NT$100,000 per month. How many people could afford all of this? It is unfortunate but true that the poor simply cannot afford to become ill.
The government could provide some subsidies for those in need of short-term care, as it does for those relying on the long-term care system. The following suggestions might be helpful:
First, family members of a patient who needs to stay in an intensive care unit, with valid proof from the hospital, should be able to apply for short-term caregiver assistance for a month beforehand, so that when the patient is transferred to a general ward, they do not have to worry about this issue.
Second, if a patient is admitted to a general ward and is diagnosed as unable to walk or eat on their own, they should be able to apply for short-term care assistance provided by a professional caregiver.
Third, when the patient is discharged from the hospital, with a doctor’s diagnosis of being incapable of walking or eating on their own, they could apply for professional short-term care services for up to two months.
Fourth, similar to the current long-term care system, the aforementioned applicants could keep applying for the assistance by using the Barthel index until long-term care services are available to them.
With the short-term care services above, family members could stay employed and earn a stable income, and their companies could operate without disruption. It would also help foreign professional caregivers in Taiwan to be transferred in a more convenient way, so that the problem of high fees for hiring a short-term caregiver could be solved.
This would also refine the management of short-term caregivers and lower the expenses for such services without causing major changes or humanitarian issues.
Hsu Yu-min
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS