In a recent lunch meeting with Executive Yuan officials, National Association of Industry and Commerce representatives called on the government to abolish the 5 percent income tax on undistributed corporate earnings — generally known as a retained earnings tax — and said that if the proposal could not be achieved in one go, the government could consider lowering the tax rate to zero in stages.
The association said that the levy on retained earnings is a supporting measure of the imputation taxation system, which the government introduced in 1998 to prevent the double taxation of dividends. After the government stopped implementation of the imputation taxation system in 2018, this supporting measure should have been abolished as well. The government should not punish firms for setting aside capital for future expansion, but should allow firms more financial flexibility to plan upgrades and for other purposes, the association said.
In addition, the association reiterated its demand that the government lower the business tax on the financial industry to at least the 2 percent level implemented before 2014, saying the tax cut would yield cost savings and enhance competitiveness for local financial institutions.
This is not the first time corporate executives have addressed tax issues with high-ranking government officials face-to-face. At different times in the past few years, many executives had repeatedly called on policymakers to make Taiwan’s business environment more friendly, but their proposals often received lukewarm responses from the government, while experts and academics were skeptical.
However, as the national tax revenue continues to rise this year and since the government is likely to meet its tax revenue target for this year as early as this month, with a surplus revenue of at least NT$100 billion (US$3.08 billion) for the whole year based on the Ministry of Finance’s estimate, many executives wanted officials to take note of their plights as many businesses are facing multiple headwinds stemming from falling external demand, supply chain inventory adjustments, post-COVID-19 transformation, and macroeconomic and geopolitical challenges.
Most importantly, corporate executives saw the upcoming presidential and legislative elections as a window of opportunity, and they wanted to take advantage of the meeting with Executive Yuan officials to put forward their tax ideas. In addition, opinions expressed through industrial and commercial groups instead of by individuals tend not to be taken lightly by government officials.
Indeed, the tug-of-war between businesses and the government over tax issues has continued for years, and it is reasonable to see more corporate executives come forward to have their voices heard ahead of elections. To a certain extent, it also highlights the many blind spots of the government’s tax administration which demand improvement and refinement.
For instance, the national tax revenue exceeded the government’s budgetary targets for 12 of the past 16 years, with surpluses almost becoming the norm in recent years. Critics have blamed this on a structural inaccuracy in the government’s tax revenue forecasting model and the fiscal conservatism adopted by the tax administration. Yet what also deserves attention is how much of the surplus tax revenue comes from inappropriate tax categories or deficiencies in the current tax system.
While paying taxes is a basic obligation for all citizens and firms, what is a reasonable level of taxation and how should those taxes be collected? Since tax revenue is the most important source of the nation’s fiscal income, the tax administration should be serious about the persistent inaccuracies in revenue forecasts that are bound to affect policymakers’ planning, the government’s resource allocation and the nation’s long-term development.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS