Global shippers are enjoying a sudden boom in rates, especially in moving raw commodities like iron ore and crude oil. Any improvement would be welcome news for a fleet that has been suffering since COVID-19 receded and demand returned to pre-pandemic levels. History suggests that no turnaround is near — it is likely these latest spikes are merely the result of short-term shocks and cannot be sustained.
Indices that track the cost of moving oil and bulk goods have posted big gains over the past few weeks. The Baltic Dry Index, the most widely followed gauge of prices to ship dry goods like coal and iron ore, has almost doubled since the start of September. The Baltic Dirty Tanker Index, its crude oil counterpart, is up 50 percent this month.
The global economy, and the outlook for next year, has not greatly improved in that time. Instead, a series of localized crises boosted demand for transportation. Indications in August that Beijing might ease up on the property sector gave the impression that iron ore might rebound, which boosted dry bulk shipping, but those hopes did not last and rates should have fallen. Instead, the Baltic Dry Index continued to rise because of a series of bad news.
Illustration: Constance Chou
Droughts across the world have been a major factor. “The low rainy season has benefited the seaborne trade of iron ore,” Athens-based Xclusiv Shipbrokers said earlier this month. That is because rain makes iron ore, a dry commodity, absorb water, which becomes heavier and more dangerous to ship. Dry weather has the opposite effect. Compounding the problem, low water levels in the Mississippi River and the Panama Canal have reduced traffic through both waterways, cutting transportation capacity and raising prices. Long waits at the Central American waterway may continue through both Christmas and Lunar New Year, the Panama Canal Administrator last month forecasted.
Then there is this month’s surprise Hamas attack in Israel, and the ensuing bombardment of Gaza. Renewed conflict in the Middle East stoked concerns over the supply of energy, chiefly oil, forcing shippers to adjust their routes. Buyers are stocking up, and they are urgently booking oil tankers. The Baltic Dirty Tanker Index shot up.
Tracking and predicting transportation rates is a science as old as shipping itself. Knowing when prices may fall gives manufacturers and traders an edge in booking capacity, while being able to predict a rebound in trade is crucial for shipowners deciding whether to buy new vessels or lay up their existing fleet. The past five years have compressed decades of boom-bust shipping cycles, offering a glimpse of the industry’s volatility. Rates across all types of shipping, including container, bulk and oil, were weakening well before COVID-19 threw the world into disarray. Yet economic indicators before the pandemic struck remained relatively strong.
This sounds counterintuitive. A strong global economy and increased trade ought to boost demand for transport, and drive prices up. It does not. Sung Man Jung, who analyzed data for his master’s thesis at the World Maritime University, looked at the periods before, during and after the 2008 financial crisis to isolate the factors affecting the Baltic Dry Index. He found that it was the supply of vessels, not a drop in gross domestic product or trade, that impacted BDI following the meltdown. A strong economy leading up to that one-time shock spurred ship owners to keep buying vessels.
More capacity to move dry bulk loads, measured in dead-weight tons, was added than retired. As a result, supply climbed 34 percent between 2007 and 2010, according to a Bloomberg Opinion analysis of data compiled by the US Department of Agriculture. The subsequent decade, driven by chronically low interest rates and a booming Chinese economy, boosted trade, but the BDI remained lackluster. Commodity prices, the most direct indicator of demand, has very little impact on shipping rates, Jung found.
What drives prices upward is short-term unsustainable shocks, and recent history has shown this to be true. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year caused the BDI to jump. Ukraine is a major grain producer and that war raised concerns about supply. Most other increases in shipping indices have been due to short-term factors. In late 2019, the maritime industry laid up large swathes of its fleet to fit air scrubbers to meet new rules on sulfur oxide emissions. Indices spiked, and then plummeted when those vessels went back into service.
With the global economic outlook worsening, as evidenced by the IMF’s recent downgrade, there is no reason to hope for a rebound in trade and shipping prices. However, this may not matter. Capacity is a bigger factor, and prolonged economic weakness coupled with an aging fleet and new environmental rules, would likely to spur ship owners to scuttle more vessels. Those betting on a sustained recovery in marine transport rates need to hold on a while longer.
Tim Culpan is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology in Asia. Previously, he was a technology reporter for Bloomberg News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS