China has been using technology as a means of infiltration and sabotage. The Chinese government has been stealing confidential information and collecting data from other countries, and worse, interfering in others’ elections. This has alerted the whole world, leading to bans on products from Chinese tech firms such as Huawei. Some countries have also passed laws and laid out regulations to prohibit exports of advanced chips to China.
Yet, what is more troubling is China’s tactics of human wave attacks and the use of bagmen. In other words, when Chinese infiltration is practiced, it is usually done at every level through different groups of people, including overseas students, reporters, tourists and businesspeople. A “honey trap” is also a commonly used strategy. Many countries’ intelligence agencies have also warned us of the extent of Chinese infiltration, which has become unprecedentedly extensive and delicately practiced.
The target of China’s honey traps includes not only a country’s legislative members and officials, but also the key players around them, such as consulting staff and assistants. Soldiers and commercial organizations are also targets, especially those related to sectors of interest to China, namely military-industrial manufacturers and semiconductor and biotechnology firms.
In 2018, France’s minister of defense and national security already reported that Chinese students in Brittany tried to obtain strategic information by attending schools there. It was also mentioned in the report that female Chinese students were trying to marry soldiers and engineers working in national defense.
China’s honey traps are not merely aimed at establishing intimate relationships; they try to blackmail people through badger games.
Needless to say, the main purpose is infiltration, and the fundamental principle to carry it out is to look for the target’s weaknesses and needs. If the person is in need of money, bribes might be offered, and if the person is wanton, a sex trap might be set up. Sometimes, infiltration is not meant for an individual, or rather, the individual is never the point. The objective is always to accomplish China’s strategic planning and fulfill its political goals. The situation in Hong Kong has already proven that.
Many Chinese citizens try to obtain a Certificate of Resident Status in Hong Kong by marital means. After several years, more Chinese are now married to Hong Kong residents. This has brought a huge impact to the structure of Hong Kong’s population and furthermore, drastically changed Hong Kong’s local culture. Sexual disputes between Chinese citizens and Hong Kong residents have occurred. Sham marriages have become quite common. News of how an elderly man in Hong Kong was tricked by a young Chinese lady is far from unique. China has a political goal and the values of Chinese are very different from those of Hong Kong residents. This has destroyed families in Hong Kong, one after another.
Taiwan has been the most significant target of China’s infiltration. Taiwanese are naturally a target for China’s honey traps.
Infiltration is subtle, delicate and embedded in daily life. Yet this does not mean that there is no way to stop it. Taiwan’s national security agencies must investigate those who are from China or have connections to China more thoroughly. China’s infiltration practices should also be exposed and regulated through legislation, so that Taiwan’s officials can employ more legislative tools to protect Taiwanese.
Hong Tsun-ming, originally from Hong Kong, is a specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s international section.
Translated by Emma Liu
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS