The presidential election is only three months away. Yet as of now, only Vice President William Lai (賴清德) has a clear campaign as the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate. Other candidates, including Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), as an independent, are still struggling to form an alliance among themselves.
Be it a Hou-Ko, Ko-Hou, Gou-Ko or Ko-Gou ticket, the disagreements between the blue and white camps have adversely affected the presidential election. When the politicians of those two camps negotiate with one another, they rarely address issues regarding national policy. Each of the presidential candidates should have already laid out his political agendas clearly for the voters, but none of these three have done so.
In this sense, did Ko propose a coalition for the greater good or only for his political interests? Would this “coalition” be able to play a role in supervising all political parties, or would it be an excuse for the politicians to blame one another to the detriment of Taiwan?
Since the beginning of his campaign, the agreement that the blue and the white camps have reached is to “oust the DPP” and achieve a transfer of political power. Of course, from the perspective of an opposition party, it is reasonable that these two slogans are used for their campaigns, and it is appropriate for them to do so. Yet when the blue and white camps are using this to gain momentum for their collaboration, they not only show how shallow and impotent they are, but also suggest they only care about their political interests.
First, to put things into context, the KMT is a century-old political party. To obtain power and political control, the KMT would defend politicians related to its own local factions, such as Miaoli County Commissioner Chung Tung-chin (鍾東錦) and KMT Legislator Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁), despite these local politicians often being mired in controversy. On the other hand, the TPP has been branding itself as a new political force, claiming that it would be able to surpass the blue and green camps and offer voters an alternative.
If the KMT and the TPP are to collaborate, the burning question is not about who should be the presidential candidate and who should be his deputy, but how those controversial political figures are to be dealt with.
Second, whenever the blue-white alliance has been discussed, we have seen those politicians attack and criticize one another. After their first meeting, some political agendas in a statement were marked as ideas the TPP was against, indicating that they had no intention of reaching a consensus among themselves.
Moreover, these politicians argued with each other about whether to use polls or a primary to determine who should be the presidential candidate. Each of them wants to employ the means most favorable to himself, and tends to blame others for the failure to form an alliance. Ko even said: “The only thing that the KMT wants to do is to get rid of me.” How could these people really work out something constructive?
Lastly, the blue and white camps are thinking about how to elevate their own status rather than focusing on Taiwan’s future. From the moment both sides started talking about collaboration, neither camp has discussed much about their political agendas and policy. Worse, even before they reach a compromise, they talk about which “position” one should take. For instance, Ko once said that he would not take everything, given that the KMT is still a larger party than the TPP. TVBS political talk show host Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) also said that the KMT should have the right to form the Cabinet, but that the TPP could decide who would head at least five of the ministries. Clearly, what occupies their minds are the official positions and political interests rather than Taiwan’s future.
Governing a country requires a lot of work. Everyone should work together in solidarity to ensure the operation of the government. The opposition party also plays an important role in overseeing the government, and this is especially important for a democratic country’s political system. Yet, an opposition party could indeed harm Taiwan, as demonstrated by the cases of KMT legislators Ma Wen-chun (馬文君) and Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷).
A few years ago, during the administration of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), the governing party did not have a legislative majority, and as a result, was unable to pass the defense budget it was seeking. Today, while the negotiation between the blue and white camp is still ongoing, each party has started blaming the other and shirking their duties. It is highly doubtful whether a coalition between them would work. Such a government might become one only capable of shirking responsibilities and constantly running on empty.
Tung Chien-hung is an associate professor at National Chung-Hsing University and president of the Central Taiwan Society.
Translated by Emma Liu
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s