Despite the school semester having started two months ago, news reports have pointed out that there has been a delay in supplying English textbooks to lower-grade elementary-school students, which concerned many parents.
Even worse, the Hsinchu City Education Department has confirmed that first and second-grade English textbooks have indeed not yet been distributed, but that it has urged the publisher to print the books as soon as possible, with the materials scheduled to be distributed on Wednesday.
It is unbelievable that such an important tool for students’ education has been neglected in this manner. What was even more ridiculous was the Hsinchu City Government’s proffering of different excuses, from a switch in printing companies to a change of edition to cancelation of hardcover and conversion to softcover, among others. It is apparent that the delay had everything to do with the government’s strategy-making.
Although the city’s education director suddenly resigned at the end of July, the new director was already in place by mid-August. Before assuming office, the new director was invited to the Hsinchu City elementary and junior-high school principals’ meeting as an adviser. As a result, the government cannot attribute the delay to a change of director. Instead, Hsinchu should get to the bottom of the issue and offer an explanation.
People working in the local government service would know that education is anything but simple, especially when it comes to teaching, an aspect that parents are much concerned with, and which plays a decisive role in students’ learning.
Although education falls under the local government, as the leading institution of nationwide education, the Ministry of Education should rectify the problem to reassure parents, and use the opportunity to show its support for teachers and civic education.
Last year on her first day in office, Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) started visiting different education personnel, listening to opinions and advice. She was hoping to take in all education issues on the public’s mind and map out timelines and strategies.
Furthermore, Kao underscored that in terms of the implementation and promotion of bilingual education, the priority would be to reduce the faculties’ burden and emphasize course preparation and talent cultivation. She would also increase the number of demonstration schools and push forward with bilingual education experimentation.
As the government is struggling with the printing and supply of English textbooks, the policy to implement bilingual education might just end up being a castle in the sky after all.
Chang Huey-por is a former president of National Changhua University of Education.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS