Despite the school semester having started two months ago, news reports have pointed out that there has been a delay in supplying English textbooks to lower-grade elementary-school students, which concerned many parents.
Even worse, the Hsinchu City Education Department has confirmed that first and second-grade English textbooks have indeed not yet been distributed, but that it has urged the publisher to print the books as soon as possible, with the materials scheduled to be distributed on Wednesday.
It is unbelievable that such an important tool for students’ education has been neglected in this manner. What was even more ridiculous was the Hsinchu City Government’s proffering of different excuses, from a switch in printing companies to a change of edition to cancelation of hardcover and conversion to softcover, among others. It is apparent that the delay had everything to do with the government’s strategy-making.
Although the city’s education director suddenly resigned at the end of July, the new director was already in place by mid-August. Before assuming office, the new director was invited to the Hsinchu City elementary and junior-high school principals’ meeting as an adviser. As a result, the government cannot attribute the delay to a change of director. Instead, Hsinchu should get to the bottom of the issue and offer an explanation.
People working in the local government service would know that education is anything but simple, especially when it comes to teaching, an aspect that parents are much concerned with, and which plays a decisive role in students’ learning.
Although education falls under the local government, as the leading institution of nationwide education, the Ministry of Education should rectify the problem to reassure parents, and use the opportunity to show its support for teachers and civic education.
Last year on her first day in office, Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) started visiting different education personnel, listening to opinions and advice. She was hoping to take in all education issues on the public’s mind and map out timelines and strategies.
Furthermore, Kao underscored that in terms of the implementation and promotion of bilingual education, the priority would be to reduce the faculties’ burden and emphasize course preparation and talent cultivation. She would also increase the number of demonstration schools and push forward with bilingual education experimentation.
As the government is struggling with the printing and supply of English textbooks, the policy to implement bilingual education might just end up being a castle in the sky after all.
Chang Huey-por is a former president of National Changhua University of Education.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS