For the sake of winning political power, sharing it among themselves and enjoying the benefits, the “blue” Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the “white” Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have not given up on their idea of forming a “blue-white” alliance to contest the “green” Democratic Progressive Party in January’s presidential election.
In addition to the obvious practical problem of each party having its own agenda, the ongoing negotiations involve a lesser-known legal obstacle, namely the question of horse trading and electoral bribery, as detailed in Article 84 of the Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act (總統副總統選舉罷免法).
Article 84 stipulates that: “Anyone who makes a candidate or a person qualified for a candidate agree to abandon the campaign or to perform certain campaign activities by asking for expected promises or delivering bribes or other undue benefits to the aforesaid party shall be condemned to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years.”
It further states that: “Any candidate or any person qualified for a candidate who asks for expected promises or accepts bribes or other undue benefits and thereupon promises to abandon the campaign or perform certain campaign activities shall also be punished in accordance with the provision of the preceding paragraph.”
Furthermore, it says that: “Anyone planning to commit the crimes referred to in the preceding two paragraphs shall be condemned to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than one year.”
This provision, which has existed since Taiwan’s first direct presidential election in 1996, is a fairly strict prohibition on election bribery.
It might not be easy for the public to understand such a provision. Simply put, it means the following:
First, no person, including a presidential or vice presidential candidate who is currently engaged in electioneering activities, even if they are not yet registered as a candidate, is allowed to engage in horse trading with these contenders by offering them money or positions, such as asking them to switch to being a vice presidential or presidential candidate, or to withdraw from competing in the presidential and vice presidential election and instead be appointed to a position such as premier.
Second, if these teams of people qualified to stand as candidates ask or obtain the agreement of other candidates’ team members to become president or vice president or to give up their candidacy, with the offer of later giving them a position such as that of premier, this also constitutes election bribery by way of horse trading. Furthermore, preparing to engage in this kind of horse trading is also punishable by imprisonment of up to one year.
Some voters might wonder if such behavior is such a serious matter. This provision, severe as it is, was passed by the legislature at a time when the KMT held a majority of legislative seats.
Do not imagine that nobody is keeping an eye on secret negotiations, and then, if news of such negotiations or their result comes to light and prosecutors start to investigate the case, turn around and moan about political persecution.
Most politicians think that the first step is the hardest, and as long as they are elected, other legal obstacles should not be a problem. Taiwan is a democracy where the rule of law prevails and any legal dispute would be laid out in the light of day, so how could people be stuck in that old mentality? If, for the sake of huge interests and the power of being in government, they place a heavy bet like a gambler, would they be able to escape from the eyes of the law? Even if they do, could they escape from the fair judgement of the voters?
Chuang Sheng-rong is a lawyer.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS