Recently, when reviewing the budget for the domestic submarine program, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator-at-large Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷) partnered with KMT Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君) to freeze the program’s budget, even threatening to cut the entire national defense budget in front of Minister of National Defense Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱國正).
Wu has undergone military training on the public dime and received a salary paid for by taxpayers. His conduct not only fails to give back to the nation, but has triggered doubts about his hidden agenda and motivation for blocking the national defense budget.
It is not uncommon for a retired general to switch to a legislative position. When former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was in office, former commander-in-chief of the navy Nelson Ku (顧崇廉) became a People First Party (PFP) legislator.
Even though the governing party and the opposition had differences over arms deal at the time, Ku, with his long-term experience from military service, still offered his invaluable insight and suggestions for arms deals, regardless of his political affiliation.
Despite the KMT and PFP’s multiple attempts to block arms deals, Ku, out of safety concerns for his men in the military, and deterrence of Chinese aggression, went against the grain to defy his party’s stance. Even though he had orders to toe the party line as a legislator-at-large, he still raised objections to the removal of the purchase of Lockheed P-3 Orion anti-submarine warfare aircraft from the budget.
Ku reiterated that there should be no politics involved when it came to national defense issues, and that he could not bear to turn his back on the nation’s military. A year later, the Lockheed P-3 Orion arms deal became one of three arms deal packages whose items were all approved, and the aircraft were put to service starting in 2013, allowing for the retirement of obsolete Grumman S-2 Tracker anti-submarine warfare aircraft.
This reduced the risks of safety concerns for pilots on duty and bolstered Taiwan’s anti-submarine capabilities. The purchase also strengthened the Strait as Taiwan’s natural barrier so it would be unusable by China as a means of sealing off Taiwan.
Ku’s sharing of his professional knowledge with other legislators, his decision to override his personal political affiliations, and his dedication to his job, the military and the nation have set an example for other retired generals who become lawmakers.
In sharp contrast with Wu, as a fellow retired general, Ku regarded national security and the welfare of the military as a top priority, offering his professional expertise to other legislative members and defied the party’s line to boost national defense. In terms of being both military personnel and a legislator, he has displayed admirable valor, integrity and justice.
By contrast, Wu not only vilified Ukraine’s bravery in defending itself, comparing it to the mindless patriotism of the boxer soldiers in the Boxer Rebellion, but also became a mouthpiece for China by threatening Taiwan with this distortion.
In terms of Ma’s alleged involvement in leaking national secrets, Wu not only refrained from rebuking her, but helped Ma to freeze the budget, abusing the power that the nation bestowed upon him.
Wu is more than an unfit legislator — he has no integrity or rectitude, brings shame upon the military, and should be subjected to the most severe condemnation.
Chen Kuan-lin is a research manager from Taipei.
Translated by Rita Wang
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
RSS