Recently, when reviewing the budget for the domestic submarine program, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator-at-large Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷) partnered with KMT Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君) to freeze the program’s budget, even threatening to cut the entire national defense budget in front of Minister of National Defense Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱國正).
Wu has undergone military training on the public dime and received a salary paid for by taxpayers. His conduct not only fails to give back to the nation, but has triggered doubts about his hidden agenda and motivation for blocking the national defense budget.
It is not uncommon for a retired general to switch to a legislative position. When former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was in office, former commander-in-chief of the navy Nelson Ku (顧崇廉) became a People First Party (PFP) legislator.
Even though the governing party and the opposition had differences over arms deal at the time, Ku, with his long-term experience from military service, still offered his invaluable insight and suggestions for arms deals, regardless of his political affiliation.
Despite the KMT and PFP’s multiple attempts to block arms deals, Ku, out of safety concerns for his men in the military, and deterrence of Chinese aggression, went against the grain to defy his party’s stance. Even though he had orders to toe the party line as a legislator-at-large, he still raised objections to the removal of the purchase of Lockheed P-3 Orion anti-submarine warfare aircraft from the budget.
Ku reiterated that there should be no politics involved when it came to national defense issues, and that he could not bear to turn his back on the nation’s military. A year later, the Lockheed P-3 Orion arms deal became one of three arms deal packages whose items were all approved, and the aircraft were put to service starting in 2013, allowing for the retirement of obsolete Grumman S-2 Tracker anti-submarine warfare aircraft.
This reduced the risks of safety concerns for pilots on duty and bolstered Taiwan’s anti-submarine capabilities. The purchase also strengthened the Strait as Taiwan’s natural barrier so it would be unusable by China as a means of sealing off Taiwan.
Ku’s sharing of his professional knowledge with other legislators, his decision to override his personal political affiliations, and his dedication to his job, the military and the nation have set an example for other retired generals who become lawmakers.
In sharp contrast with Wu, as a fellow retired general, Ku regarded national security and the welfare of the military as a top priority, offering his professional expertise to other legislative members and defied the party’s line to boost national defense. In terms of being both military personnel and a legislator, he has displayed admirable valor, integrity and justice.
By contrast, Wu not only vilified Ukraine’s bravery in defending itself, comparing it to the mindless patriotism of the boxer soldiers in the Boxer Rebellion, but also became a mouthpiece for China by threatening Taiwan with this distortion.
In terms of Ma’s alleged involvement in leaking national secrets, Wu not only refrained from rebuking her, but helped Ma to freeze the budget, abusing the power that the nation bestowed upon him.
Wu is more than an unfit legislator — he has no integrity or rectitude, brings shame upon the military, and should be subjected to the most severe condemnation.
Chen Kuan-lin is a research manager from Taipei.
Translated by Rita Wang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS