In the current digitalized world, it is increasingly difficult to distinguish between genuine concerns raised democratically by citizens and politically motivated talking points pushed forth by those with ulterior motives.
There was a time when online users could calmly articulate a political position and others would likewise respond in a thoughtful manner. These days, respectful disagreements and civil online debates are rare. The descent toward a populist online culture is no particular group’s fault. Social media platforms constantly flood their users with information far beyond the limits of a sane person’s attention span. In this ecosystem, sensationalist positions are naturally the ones that get the most spotlight.
Nonetheless, there are often concentrated efforts by presumptuous individuals like former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) employee Hsu Che-pin (許哲賓) — who was involved in faking death threats along with online personality Lin Yu-hong (林裕紘) to garner public support during the egg scandal — to manufacture crisis and sow distrust. Even though they lacked any convincing evidence, KMT legislators previously held a news conference accusing the DPP of involvement in sending the threats.
A recent legal investigation revealed that Hsu possessed more than 1,000 Facebook accounts. There is no reasonable explanation why a normal citizen needs to possess so many accounts. Hsu’s ties to the KMT and other pan-blue factions must be taken seriously under the ongoing investigation. This is likely the tip of the iceberg.
What other disinformation has Hsu spread online? Were his numerous accounts used to promote any particular political campaigns or to attack opponents? Has any group or foreign entity paid Hsu for his services?
The KMT’s response to the scandal has been disappointing. It seems to be distancing itself from Hsu and hoping that the situation would eventually resolve itself. Any transparent investigation into Hsu during his employment as a KMT staffer has been utterly lacking. Are Taiwanese supposed to believe that Hsu’s fake death threats were an isolated incident and that he had never used his numerous fake accounts before the incident?
Any political party that directly or indirectly manipulates voters online through fake accounts should be condemned. These manipulations are not only detrimental to a healthy functioning society, but also toxic to an individual’s mind.
US novelist John Steinbeck once wrote: “The free, exploring mind of the individual human is the most valuable thing in the world.”
If Taiwan truly wishes to accommodate free and exploring minds, political parties must lead by example and refrain from using underhanded political tactics. The Internet as frontier for the free exchange of ideas is something truly worth protecting. Furthermore, Taiwanese must make all parties realize the grave political costs of orchestrating online misinformation campaigns.
Linus Chiou is a part-time writer based in Kaohsiung.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS