Theoretically, arranged marriages work because the union benefits from the experience and wisdom of the matchmakers, while unions born of love succeed due to the strength of the bonds that see the partners hold on to each other through thick and thin.
Neither of these dynamics applies to the proposed “blue-white alliance” between the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), which amounts to little more than a marriage of convenience.
Hou and Ko separately held news conferences to discuss the proposal on Tuesday.
Hou said that he would accept being placed second on the ticket, but an alliance would only make sense if both men’s names were listed.
First, there is no way that the KMT would accept its candidate playing second fiddle. Second, even though the media is not privy to the talks, it seems like Ko has expressed doubts about whether he wants Hou on the same ticket.
Hou himself admitted that Ko has not made it clear yet whether he wants to take Hou as his “wife.”
Considering Hou said that, he must be expecting to be rejected. It has been suggested that Ko has his eyes on former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) or independent presidential candidate Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘).
Ko said he felt like being forced into a marriage, but he does have the option of saying no.
He also expressed concerns about the larger KMT trying to strong-arm the smaller TPP.
This is exactly what is happening, although it is unclear why he would be surprised and where — given this realization — he sees the relationship going after the honeymoon period.
Ko acknowledges that the TPP and the KMT have different cultures and agendas, but he sees the alliance as desirable to oust the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), as he believes two terms in office has made the DPP arrogant. As a doctor, Ko accurately diagnosed the KMT to be just as arrogant, and determined that the relationship’s future did not look good.
This coalition experiment is new for Taiwan’s democratic development, and it needs to be done correctly.
If the two parties cannot agree now, if the basis for the inability to reach an agreement is a lack of mutual trust and difference in vision, and the ties that bind are only a shared determination to oust the DPP, what are the chances that the two parties would be able to maintain a unity of purpose in government? With the longstanding lack of intraparty unity the KMT is notorious for and the inexperience of the TPP, what are the chances that there would not be a huge bust-up in the aftermath of the election?
Hou and Ko are negotiating this alliance as if it would be Ko and Hou running the show, but if we have learned anything from the KMT’s campaign thus far, it is that the shadow of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has loomed large in the background. Ko should be careful about whom he ends up with in the marital bed.
The election is not about winning on Jan. 13. It is about earning the right to govern, and from there to govern effectively.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS