On Sept. 28, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a strong press release expressing great regret and condemnation of the use of the Nazi flag by a few Taiwanese citizens. We write to express our support for the reasoning conveyed in the ministry’s statement.
Symbols matter deeply in our society. Visual language is powerful, influencing our thoughts and emotions subtly and profoundly. This is true when we use casual emojis in our texts and even more so when we see world-known trademarks and national symbols.
National symbols carry profound meanings and evoke deep emotions. They reflect the history, struggles, and values of people and communities. As such, they deserve respect and sensitivity from global citizens due to the weight of the narratives they carry.
The Nazi Swastika is a prime example, being one of the most recognizable modern symbols.
It stems from the darkest chapter of Germany history, where it served as the most significant and notorious of hate symbols, representing antisemitism and racial segregation, which lead to the persecution of Jews and other communities, and those with a different religious and sexual orientations.
Nazi Germany went so far as to set in motion the Final Solution — a genocide that involved mass murders.
The Swastika flag as the symbol of Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler also stands for the horror of World War II during which about 60 million people died: about 20 million military personnel and 40 million civilians.
Against this background, the use of the symbols associated with the Nazi party, the swastika and the swastika flag, is still outlawed in Germany. Many other countries, too, have banned Nazi symbols: It is considered a criminal offense if they are displayed publicly for non-educational purposes.
The display of this deeply offensive Nazi symbol on large flags in the heart of Taipei city is therefore deeply troubling and offensive, not only because of the atrocities associated with this symbol to Jews and many other communities deemed undesirable by the Nazis, but also because it dangerously normalizes and integrates a symbol of hate into an accepted reality.
Israel, bearing the indelible scars of the Holocaust, understands intimately the pain and suffering that Nazi symbols inflict, as does Germany remembering its history. This symbol is not merely a twisted cross; it represents a regime that orchestrated the genocide of 6 million Jews and millions of others. Each time this symbol is presented, it tears open old wounds and revives memories of atrocities that should never be forgotten or trivialized.
Taiwan, a beacon of democracy and freedom in the Asia-Pacific region, has rightfully condemned the inappropriate use of a symbol steeped in hatred and discrimination.
It is true that freedom of speech is a fundamental right, but it is crucial to acknowledge the delicate balance between freedom of speech and the propagation of hate speech. The latter should never find shield or justification under the banner of free expression.
This is especially true when these offensive symbols are displayed in front of a school. Children are the most vulnerable members of our societies, they are strongly protected by law. It should be our common goal to shield them from malign influences and symbols of hate.
All nations and individuals bear the responsibility of weighing the impact of their words and actions on others, particularly when they harm or offend, as witnessed in this unfortunate event. Exercising democratic rights responsibly is an obligation that falls upon all of us.
The Taiwanese government has been a staunch advocate of human rights and freedoms, cohosting an annual event since 2016 to honor International Holocaust Remembrance Day alongside Israel and Germany. We are confident in Taiwan’s empathy, understanding and respect toward this important issue.
Now is an opportune time for Taiwan to act and foster an environment adhering to international norms and standards. In a world growing increasingly interconnected and interdependent, we should all collectively aspire for national symbols to serve as bridges of understanding, friendship and tolerance among us all, and avoid any symbols expressing the opposite. This prudent approach is even more important when uninformed and vulnerable children are exposed, as is the case in Taipei’s Shilin District (士林) today.
Maya Yaron is Israel’s representative to Taiwan. Jorg Polster is director-general of the German Institute Taipei.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s