The third of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals is to “ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages.”
However, people around the world are not equal in health and well-being.
For example, people in developed countries — who tend to have higher incomes and access to better technology — are more likely to have better health and well-being.
To reduce the number of disadvantaged people, good health and well-being for all needs to be promoted by governments worldwide to protect the rights of their citizens.
As no country can stand alone, each government should assist other countries to achieve good health and well-being.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, good administration of vaccine delivery improved people’s well-being.
As infectious diseases can spread from one country to another, countries that have vaccines in a future emergency should distribute vaccines to other countries immediately to help prevent outbreaks.
Moreover, an environmental crisis in one country can affect others.
For example, with Japan releasing wastewater from the crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant into the Pacific Ocean, countries that might be affected should have been allowed to participate in the decisionmaking process.
This would have protected the good health and well-being of people in all countries.
To avoid widespread environmental damage, cooperation between nations is required. They need to share essential knowledge and technology to resolve problems. This could help accomplish the Sustainable Development Goals, not only in one country, but in the whole world.
When resources are effectively shared internationally, people in any part of the world have equal access to physical and psychological well-being.
Good sustainable development strategies by governments in all countries would benefit all people.
Phathara-on Wesarat is head of the Bachelor of Business Administration Program in the Humanities and Social Sciences Department at Prince of Songkla University in Thailand.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS