The third of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals is to “ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages.”
However, people around the world are not equal in health and well-being.
For example, people in developed countries — who tend to have higher incomes and access to better technology — are more likely to have better health and well-being.
To reduce the number of disadvantaged people, good health and well-being for all needs to be promoted by governments worldwide to protect the rights of their citizens.
As no country can stand alone, each government should assist other countries to achieve good health and well-being.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, good administration of vaccine delivery improved people’s well-being.
As infectious diseases can spread from one country to another, countries that have vaccines in a future emergency should distribute vaccines to other countries immediately to help prevent outbreaks.
Moreover, an environmental crisis in one country can affect others.
For example, with Japan releasing wastewater from the crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant into the Pacific Ocean, countries that might be affected should have been allowed to participate in the decisionmaking process.
This would have protected the good health and well-being of people in all countries.
To avoid widespread environmental damage, cooperation between nations is required. They need to share essential knowledge and technology to resolve problems. This could help accomplish the Sustainable Development Goals, not only in one country, but in the whole world.
When resources are effectively shared internationally, people in any part of the world have equal access to physical and psychological well-being.
Good sustainable development strategies by governments in all countries would benefit all people.
Phathara-on Wesarat is head of the Bachelor of Business Administration Program in the Humanities and Social Sciences Department at Prince of Songkla University in Thailand.
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
Birth, aging, illness and death are inevitable parts of the human experience. Yet, living well does not necessarily mean dying well. For those who have a chronic illness or cancer, or are bedridden due to significant injuries or disabilities, the remainder of life can be a torment for themselves and a hardship for their caregivers. Even if they wish to end their life with dignity, they are not allowed to do so. Bih Liu-ing (畢柳鶯), former superintendent of Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, introduced the practice of Voluntary Stopping of Eating and Drinking as an alternative to assisted dying, which remains
President William Lai (賴清德) has rightly identified the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as a hostile force; and yet, Taiwan’s response to domestic figures amplifying CCP propaganda remains largely insufficient. The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) recently confirmed that more than 20 Taiwanese entertainers, including high-profile figures such as Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜), are under investigation for reposting comments and images supporting People’s Liberation Army (PLA) drills and parroting Beijing’s unification messaging. If found in contravention of the law, they may be fined between NT$100,000 and NT$500,000. That is not a deterrent. It is a symbolic tax on betrayal — perhaps even a way for
RSS