Re-evaluate Teachers’ Act
Premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) reported to the Legislative Yuan recently. During his report, a lawmaker said that three years have passed since the Teachers’ Act (教師法) was amended. So far, 649 bullying cases have been reported, but only 35 were investigated. Moreover, among the teachers accused of bullying, only one was dismissed and will not be reappointed. The lawmaker asked Chen if the Teachers’ Act should be examined and re-evaluated for further revisions.
How long must the victims wait for justice? Many students would like to ask the same questions.
Chen said that he would hasten the discussion process and come up with methods for more revisions as soon as possible.
Only 35 cases were investigated out of 649. The proportion certainly compels one to ask whether the revisions are effective or not, and this shows that the Teachers’ Act should be reassessed and revised.
Of course, we should adhere to the principle of “in dubio pro reo,” which means that a defendant may not be convicted by the court when doubts about their guilt remain.
However, if all evidence is presented, the defendant must be penalized. Appeasing criminals results in more victims. The proportion should also prompt one to ask whether teachers are covering up their colleagues’ mistakes and closing ranks. Official agencies should consider conducting further investigations in this respect.
Good teachers should be applauded, but those who are unqualified to be teachers should be dismissed.
This should be done for the sake of students. Whether students are taught by a good or a bad teacher has the potential to greatly impact their lives.
Additionally, what teachers say to students can either encourage them to do better or damage their lives.
Worse still, students might kill themselves because of their teachers’ behavior and comments. It would be a tragedy for a student if a teacher who has harmed them keeps their job. It is my hope that the Teachers’ Act be revised as soon as possible.
A teacher who is no longer suitable for their position should leave the field of education. The longer a teacher stays at a school, the more difficult it is for their victims to recover from inflicted harm. When students get hurt, the damage is usually deep and tremendous. We should never treat bullying cases lightly.
Hsu Chia-hsin
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS