Re-evaluate Teachers’ Act
Premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) reported to the Legislative Yuan recently. During his report, a lawmaker said that three years have passed since the Teachers’ Act (教師法) was amended. So far, 649 bullying cases have been reported, but only 35 were investigated. Moreover, among the teachers accused of bullying, only one was dismissed and will not be reappointed. The lawmaker asked Chen if the Teachers’ Act should be examined and re-evaluated for further revisions.
How long must the victims wait for justice? Many students would like to ask the same questions.
Chen said that he would hasten the discussion process and come up with methods for more revisions as soon as possible.
Only 35 cases were investigated out of 649. The proportion certainly compels one to ask whether the revisions are effective or not, and this shows that the Teachers’ Act should be reassessed and revised.
Of course, we should adhere to the principle of “in dubio pro reo,” which means that a defendant may not be convicted by the court when doubts about their guilt remain.
However, if all evidence is presented, the defendant must be penalized. Appeasing criminals results in more victims. The proportion should also prompt one to ask whether teachers are covering up their colleagues’ mistakes and closing ranks. Official agencies should consider conducting further investigations in this respect.
Good teachers should be applauded, but those who are unqualified to be teachers should be dismissed.
This should be done for the sake of students. Whether students are taught by a good or a bad teacher has the potential to greatly impact their lives.
Additionally, what teachers say to students can either encourage them to do better or damage their lives.
Worse still, students might kill themselves because of their teachers’ behavior and comments. It would be a tragedy for a student if a teacher who has harmed them keeps their job. It is my hope that the Teachers’ Act be revised as soon as possible.
A teacher who is no longer suitable for their position should leave the field of education. The longer a teacher stays at a school, the more difficult it is for their victims to recover from inflicted harm. When students get hurt, the damage is usually deep and tremendous. We should never treat bullying cases lightly.
Hsu Chia-hsin
Taipei
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS