Every year, Taiwan purchases about 7 million doses of influenza vaccines. These vaccines are administered free of charge in batches, starting this month with people aged 65 or older, followed by the second batch next month for those older than 50. By the end of the year, about 5 million to 6 million doses would have been used. Starting from the New Year, vaccinations are to be opened up to anyone.
Of course, the uptake of vaccines varies from year to year. This year, due to the “immunity debt” factor, a lot of people have recently been coming down with the flu, and there is quite a strong demand for flu vaccines.
In previous years, people have wanted to be vaccinated with imported flu vaccines such as those made by French-based Sanofi or imported from Germany by TTY Biopharm, while those made by Taiwan’s Adimmune Corp have not been quite so popular.
However, as a physician, I always explain to my patients that Adimmune’s vaccine research and development is done under Japanese guidance and the quality is good. I assure them that I have been administering Adimmune’s vaccines for many years and they can put their faith in them.
Most patients are willing to accept this advice, so our first-line clinic has been doing this for many years without any arguments or disputes.
This year, a flu vaccine marketed by Taiwan’s Medigen Vaccine Biologics Corp has been added to the list. The vaccine is made by South Korea’s GC Biopharma and packaged into vials by Medigen’s pharmaceuticals factory in Taiwan, and most experts agree that it is of very good quality.
Unfortunately, due to ideological and political differences in Taiwan, some people have no faith in Medigen, while others have ulterior motives for undermining people’s faith.
Consequently, many parents and elderly people have stumbled upon Internet posts and messages that worry them. Uncertain what to believe, they would rather be safe than sorry.
At the same time, some mayors and county commissioners want to respect parents’ choices, in some cases even issuing clear instructions that schoolchildren should not be given Medigen vaccines, and this has made many elderly people even more doubtful about getting a Medigen jab.
However, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has for many years stipulated that the public cannot choose between vaccines and must take whichever is available. You might think that this year’s addition of Medigen vaccines would make things easier, but it is conversely causing more of a headache for clinics, even eroding doctor-patient trust.
The authorities have only bought 700,000 doses of the Medigen vaccine this year. Rather than making elderly people worried and afraid, making life difficult for clinics and spoiling the trust between doctors and patients, it would be better to assign the Medigen vaccines to the last batch so they could be used early next year, when free vaccines become available for the under-50s. That would come as a big relief for everyone.
The CDC should not insist that the public not be able to choose their vaccines and have to accept the Medigen jab if that is the only one available. At best that would cause widespread resentment, and at worst it would make elderly people hesitant about getting vaccinated, which would cause some of them to end up seriously ill in a hospital or even endanger their lives. It is high time for the CDC to give this issue a thorough rethink.
Wang Fong-yu is a standing director of the Taiwan Medical Association.
Translated by Julian Clegg
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs spokesman for maritime affairs Rogelio Villanueva on Monday said that Manila’s claims in the South China Sea are backed by international law. Villanueva was responding to a social media post by the Chinese embassy alleging that a former Philippine ambassador in 1990 had written a letter to a German radio operator stating that the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島) did not fall within Manila’s territory. “Sovereignty is not merely claimed, it is exercised,” Villanueva said. The Philippines won a landmark case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016 that found China’s sweeping claim of sovereignty in
RSS