Taiwanese business investments in countries covered by the New Southbound Policy have surged this year, partly due to a continued global supply chain realignment after the COVID-19 pandemic and also because of increasing US-China trade tensions.
Statitics released by the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Department of Investment Review on Friday showed that outbound investments approved by the government, excluding those to China, in the first nine months of this year totaled US$17.48 billion, an annual increase of 190.06 percent. The department said that investments by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co in the US and those by Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (better known internationally as Foxconn) and Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp in Singapore were a major boost to Taiwanese firms’ outlays for overseas expansions during the nine-month period. Taiwan’s outbound investments to New Southbound Policy countries totaled US$4.33 billion in the first nine months, up 65.49 percent from the same period last year thanks to local firms’ increasing investments in Singapore, Vietnam and Thailand, the department said.
By comparison, the nation’s outbound investments to China decreased 17.03 percent year-on-year to US$2.53 billion in the first nine months, the department said, predicting that the full-year figure would reach US$3.5 billion, which is not only lower than the US$4.1 billion recorded in 2019 following the US-China trade spat, but also likely to be the lowest since China joined the WTO in 2001, it said.
Taiwan’s outbound investments to New Southbound Policy countries might surpass those to China for a second straight year, after investments to these countries — ranging from electronics and computers to textiles and sportswear — reached US$5.27 billion last year compared with the US$5.05 billion to China.
This development echoes a global trend that firms are compelled to relocate some of their manufacturing operations to South and Southeast Asia from China to avoid US tariffs, as well as reduce their single-market dependence on China. From a national perspective, this build-out helps reinforce Taiwan’s economic ties with South and Southeast Asia and several other regions, while bolstering the nation’s economic resilience.
When choosing investment locations, Taiwanese firms’ main considerations are always land, labor, infrastructure, market potential, local supply chains, political and social stability, personnel and property safety, and the distance from Taiwan. So far, the manufacturing sector remains a hotspot for investments in New Southbound Policy countries, although Taiwanese capital is increasingly flowing into those markets through equity investments, particularly via joint ventures in finance, transportation, healthcare and green energy.
As long as economic benefits and geopolitics are considered, New Southbound Policy countries are poised to be a prime destination for Taiwanese firms pursuing a “China-plus-one” investment strategy to realign supply chains and avoid over-concentration on China. Yet, challenges remain, such as underdeveloped infrastructure and a scarcity of skilled labor.
A lack of workers in ASEAN has become an acute issue after foreign capital’s rapid increase in the post-COVID-19 era for dual sourcing of raw materials and supply chain reorganization. For example, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia and even Indonesia have experienced extensive or partial worker and talent shortages, posing challenges for many industries.
Taiwan’s government should help firms address this staffing issue by seeking ways to work with regional counterparts to cultivate skilled labor, promote talent exchanges and cooperate in technical and vocational education. It should also help Taiwanese businesses to understand new international labor regulations and demand that local firms improve regulatory compliance overseas.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed