Taiwanese business investments in countries covered by the New Southbound Policy have surged this year, partly due to a continued global supply chain realignment after the COVID-19 pandemic and also because of increasing US-China trade tensions.
Statitics released by the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Department of Investment Review on Friday showed that outbound investments approved by the government, excluding those to China, in the first nine months of this year totaled US$17.48 billion, an annual increase of 190.06 percent. The department said that investments by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co in the US and those by Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (better known internationally as Foxconn) and Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp in Singapore were a major boost to Taiwanese firms’ outlays for overseas expansions during the nine-month period. Taiwan’s outbound investments to New Southbound Policy countries totaled US$4.33 billion in the first nine months, up 65.49 percent from the same period last year thanks to local firms’ increasing investments in Singapore, Vietnam and Thailand, the department said.
By comparison, the nation’s outbound investments to China decreased 17.03 percent year-on-year to US$2.53 billion in the first nine months, the department said, predicting that the full-year figure would reach US$3.5 billion, which is not only lower than the US$4.1 billion recorded in 2019 following the US-China trade spat, but also likely to be the lowest since China joined the WTO in 2001, it said.
Taiwan’s outbound investments to New Southbound Policy countries might surpass those to China for a second straight year, after investments to these countries — ranging from electronics and computers to textiles and sportswear — reached US$5.27 billion last year compared with the US$5.05 billion to China.
This development echoes a global trend that firms are compelled to relocate some of their manufacturing operations to South and Southeast Asia from China to avoid US tariffs, as well as reduce their single-market dependence on China. From a national perspective, this build-out helps reinforce Taiwan’s economic ties with South and Southeast Asia and several other regions, while bolstering the nation’s economic resilience.
When choosing investment locations, Taiwanese firms’ main considerations are always land, labor, infrastructure, market potential, local supply chains, political and social stability, personnel and property safety, and the distance from Taiwan. So far, the manufacturing sector remains a hotspot for investments in New Southbound Policy countries, although Taiwanese capital is increasingly flowing into those markets through equity investments, particularly via joint ventures in finance, transportation, healthcare and green energy.
As long as economic benefits and geopolitics are considered, New Southbound Policy countries are poised to be a prime destination for Taiwanese firms pursuing a “China-plus-one” investment strategy to realign supply chains and avoid over-concentration on China. Yet, challenges remain, such as underdeveloped infrastructure and a scarcity of skilled labor.
A lack of workers in ASEAN has become an acute issue after foreign capital’s rapid increase in the post-COVID-19 era for dual sourcing of raw materials and supply chain reorganization. For example, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia and even Indonesia have experienced extensive or partial worker and talent shortages, posing challenges for many industries.
Taiwan’s government should help firms address this staffing issue by seeking ways to work with regional counterparts to cultivate skilled labor, promote talent exchanges and cooperate in technical and vocational education. It should also help Taiwanese businesses to understand new international labor regulations and demand that local firms improve regulatory compliance overseas.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then