Taiwanese business investments in countries covered by the New Southbound Policy have surged this year, partly due to a continued global supply chain realignment after the COVID-19 pandemic and also because of increasing US-China trade tensions.
Statitics released by the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Department of Investment Review on Friday showed that outbound investments approved by the government, excluding those to China, in the first nine months of this year totaled US$17.48 billion, an annual increase of 190.06 percent. The department said that investments by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co in the US and those by Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (better known internationally as Foxconn) and Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp in Singapore were a major boost to Taiwanese firms’ outlays for overseas expansions during the nine-month period. Taiwan’s outbound investments to New Southbound Policy countries totaled US$4.33 billion in the first nine months, up 65.49 percent from the same period last year thanks to local firms’ increasing investments in Singapore, Vietnam and Thailand, the department said.
By comparison, the nation’s outbound investments to China decreased 17.03 percent year-on-year to US$2.53 billion in the first nine months, the department said, predicting that the full-year figure would reach US$3.5 billion, which is not only lower than the US$4.1 billion recorded in 2019 following the US-China trade spat, but also likely to be the lowest since China joined the WTO in 2001, it said.
Taiwan’s outbound investments to New Southbound Policy countries might surpass those to China for a second straight year, after investments to these countries — ranging from electronics and computers to textiles and sportswear — reached US$5.27 billion last year compared with the US$5.05 billion to China.
This development echoes a global trend that firms are compelled to relocate some of their manufacturing operations to South and Southeast Asia from China to avoid US tariffs, as well as reduce their single-market dependence on China. From a national perspective, this build-out helps reinforce Taiwan’s economic ties with South and Southeast Asia and several other regions, while bolstering the nation’s economic resilience.
When choosing investment locations, Taiwanese firms’ main considerations are always land, labor, infrastructure, market potential, local supply chains, political and social stability, personnel and property safety, and the distance from Taiwan. So far, the manufacturing sector remains a hotspot for investments in New Southbound Policy countries, although Taiwanese capital is increasingly flowing into those markets through equity investments, particularly via joint ventures in finance, transportation, healthcare and green energy.
As long as economic benefits and geopolitics are considered, New Southbound Policy countries are poised to be a prime destination for Taiwanese firms pursuing a “China-plus-one” investment strategy to realign supply chains and avoid over-concentration on China. Yet, challenges remain, such as underdeveloped infrastructure and a scarcity of skilled labor.
A lack of workers in ASEAN has become an acute issue after foreign capital’s rapid increase in the post-COVID-19 era for dual sourcing of raw materials and supply chain reorganization. For example, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia and even Indonesia have experienced extensive or partial worker and talent shortages, posing challenges for many industries.
Taiwan’s government should help firms address this staffing issue by seeking ways to work with regional counterparts to cultivate skilled labor, promote talent exchanges and cooperate in technical and vocational education. It should also help Taiwanese businesses to understand new international labor regulations and demand that local firms improve regulatory compliance overseas.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS