High interest rates, geopolitical risks and skittish investors have created the worst year for mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in a decade, but sports is one corner of the global investment market where deals just will not stop. From the proposed merger of the PGA and LIV golf tours to the US$6 billion acquisition of the Washington Commanders football team, billions in investment capital is finding its way onto the field of play.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc is among those ready to get in on the game. Last month, the bank announced a new “sports franchise” unit within its investment banking division. It should not have any problems finding business. In uncertain economic times, sports are turning out to be the resilient asset class that (very big) investors simply cannot pass up.
The deals are coming fast. In the past 10 months, they were highlighted by, among other transactions, the world’s largest professional wrestling and mixed-martial arts promoters merging to create a US$21 billion Goliath and Michael Jordan selling the Charlotte Hornets for US$3 billion. It is not just teams and leagues dealing. In the second quarter, the sports technology sector, which ranges over everything from gambling tech to wearables, saw more than 100 merger and acquisition deals, exceeding the volume and dollar amounts from the previous four quarters.
Investors should be interested: Few asset classes have appreciated as dramatically as sports franchises in recent years. From 2018 to this year, the combined value of Forbes’ analysis of the 50 most valuable sports franchises increased by 90 percent to US$256 billion.
Three factors drive that growth.
First, the rights to broadcast and stream live sports continue to grow in value. This year, the global value of the industry’s media rights reached US$55 billion, and one analyst expects it to hit US$65 billion in 2025.
Second, sports viewership has remained incredibly resilient, even after the COVID-19 pandemic forced the shutdown of live events. As just one example, early this season, the NFL is seeing some of its best television ratings in years (partly thanks to Taylor Swift). Likewise, the last English Premier League season had its best US viewership since 2015-16.
Third, scarcity and status drive demand. For example, there are only 30 NBA franchises, making the league one of the world’s most exclusive clubs. As the ranks of billionaires who can afford — and covet — a franchise grows, the number of teams remains static. When one goes on the market, the bidding is fierce and the ultimate selling price is high.
Many owners and investors believe that strategic mergers between teams and leagues can unlock even more value. Media rights, in particular, might benefit from a consolidated bid between teams or leagues. That was partly the theory behind the merger of World Wrestling Entertainment and Ultimate Fighting Championships. Both have lucrative media rights deals up for renewal in the next couple of years. Perhaps bankers and investors wonder if they can gain more by consolidating their offerings.
Likewise, other investors believe mergers can create efficiencies in everything from player scouting and development to marketing. In part, that is the reason why US-owned BlueCo, the owner of English soccer giant Chelsea FC, recently purchased RC Strasbourg Alsace, a top-tier French club. BlueCo, founded by private equity veterans, is not alone in seeing synergies. By one account, 180 clubs worldwide and 6,500 players were part of multi-club ownership groups, and the trend is growing.
As valuations rise, the days when an eccentric local sports fan with resources could buy and manage a team are fading away. Instead, the transactions require multiple partners, interests, complex financing, and financial and personal background checks. Those are among the reasons why the NBA, MLB and NHL have changed their ownership rules to allow stakes by private equity. The rule changes allow larger numbers of investors — motivated by growth or simply fandom — to get involved in what looks like the surest bet in mergers and acquisitions.
Goldman’s new sports franchise unit, formed at what might be the boom’s peak, is poised to take advantage.
Of course, sports could falter. Regulatory pressures, especially in Europe, could end multi-club ownership, undercutting business plans and investment. Likewise, media rights deals — the revenue stream upon which so many long-term sports investment strategies are built — could falter in the face of cord-cutting and the shift from traditional broadcasters to streamers. Will sports fans continue bankrolling big player salaries via increasingly expensive streaming subscriptions? The answers to that question might not be clear for several years, and by that time, it might be too late for investors who are buying now.
However, as the rest of the mergers and acquisitions universe falters, those are small, long-term concerns. With a proven record of prospering through economic downturns and even a pandemic, sports are the steady investment that the world’s biggest investors want in their corner.
Adam Minter is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering the business of sports. He is the author, most recently, of Secondhand: Travels in the New Global Garage Sale. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS