Another pork wholesaler was raided last weekend over imported US pork products falsely relabeled as originating in other countries before being supplied to restaurants. It was the third wholesaler to be involved in alleged country of origin labeling fraud this month.
Dozens of restaurants were also penalized for not declaring or mislabeling countries of origin of their pork-containing products this month, as local health departments increased inspections, following the raid on the first wholesaler earlier this month.
The mislabeling has stirred public concerns, as some are worried that the pork might contain ractopamine, a feed additive used in livestock to promote lean muscle, and that it could harm health.
Concerns were raised and debated for years, but despite controversies, Taiwan in 2021 lifted its ban on US pork containing ractopamine within the maximum residue limit, and regulations require pork products sold anywhere to legibly show the country of origin.
While the Food and Drug Administration had tested the US pork sold by the three wholesalers and found no traces of the additive, it on Wednesday reassured the public that since 2021, none of its tests on imported pork, not just US pork, had detected any ractopamine residue.
However, opposition parties, particularly the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), were happy to seize on the opportunity, accusing the government of neglecting the nation’s food safety by allowing “illicit transshipment” of US pork, and using the terms “ractopork” and “US pork” interchangeably, amplifying fear.
The Taichung City Government even publicized a list of 81 restaurants in the city that have served US pork from two of the wholesalers that mislabeled its US pork products as being Canadian or from the UK, seeming to imply that all US pork is problematic and that consumers should be warned, but some of the restaurants felt offended, as they, too, were the victims of alleged false origin labeling.
KMT legislators, local councilors and even the party’s presidential candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), have accused the government of ignoring the “illicit transshipment” of US pork, misleading the public with a catchy but erroneous term, although Ministry of Health and Welfare officials have clarified that it is not a problem of “illicit transshipment,” but of alleged “false labeling” by unscrupulous traders or restaurants, for which the culprits were fined, adding that not all US pork contains ractopamine.
The term “illicit transshipment” is used to describe the diversion of products from their origin, through a third country or special economic zone for slight processing or to illegaly change the origin label, such as Chinese exporters shipping goods through some Southeast Asian countries, illegally relabeling them as made from those countries to avoid raised US tariffs.
The KMT’s previous presidential candidate Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) in 2019 proposed setting up a “free trade special economic zone” in Kaohsiung, which at the time sparked concerns it would be used for “illicit transshipment” of poor-quality Chinese goods, relabeling them as Made in Taiwan and sold to other countries, harming Taiwanese products’ reputation.
While food fraud, including mislabeling, is commonplace in the global food chain, consumers, the government and food industry must work together to call out fraud and bring bad actors to justice.
However, while unethical traders and retailers have been fined, politicians’ deliberate misuse of terms to sow public discontent and fear, aimed at misleading them against the government or all US pork products, does not benefit the nation’s food safety, but erodes public trust in the government’s scientific institutions and their inspections and testing results, leaving people less informed and easily affected by unfounded food scares.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS