For decades, China’s “sea turtles” — a nickname for Chinese who returned to the motherland after years of studying and working abroad — prospered. They served as a cultural bridge, facilitating Western business expansion and investments into China. Along the way, they rose to the top at global banks and corporations, and earned millions of dollars.
Those were the good times. As Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) relations with the West continue to deteriorate, this cultural arbitrage — leveraging knowledge of both worlds and helping foreigners make money in China — is no longer working. To have viable careers, many “sea turtles” will soon have to choose: Do they want to be Chinese or Western?
Some of the popular professional paths are now fraught with uncertainty. Consider private wealth management, prized by every Wall Street bank for its steady fee income. In Asia, the primary focus of thousands of relationship managers is on China’s new rich. As of last year, there were about 6.2 million Chinese millionaires, according to UBS Group AG estimates.
On top of millionaires’ minds is how to get their money out of China, which caps the annual outflow to US$50,000 per person. With the yuan down 5.7 percent this year, the government is tightening its scrutiny of capital movements, going as far as banning Chinese brokers from opening offshore accounts for mainland retail investors.
This macro backdrop places private bankers in a gray zone. While they are not allowed by their employers to help clients bypass China’s capital controls, some do share contact information for underground agencies that do to maintain good relationships at a time when competition on the street is heating up. However, by doing so, they may be putting their safety at risk. In August, Shanghai detained five people for illegal foreign currency transactions, including a woman who ran an immigration services company.
The picture is hardly prettier for dealmakers seeking foreign money for Chinese start-ups. They waited out the draconian “zero COVID-19” restrictions, but have found no light at the end of the tunnel. Fundraising in Hong Kong, once the world’s top venue for initial public offerings (IPO), is on track for a two-decade low. Meanwhile, the mainland bourses are dominating the global IPO market. There, businesses sanctioned by Washington have become market darlings. How can a “sea turtle” working for a global firm sell these seismic investment trends to their clients? Their compliance officers would ring alarm bells.
These days, when I speak to my fellow “sea turtles,” geopolitics is clearly front and center. During my visit to Shanghai last week, a common lament was that the financial hub had “few foreigners left” — the city had gone through a brutal month-long COVID lockdown in April last year and many expats decided to depart in the aftermath. A few asked me if the recent conflict in the Middle East would divert the world’s attention away from Ukraine, and Xi’s “no limits” friendship with Russia, the invader.
Alas, the geopolitical tension is here to stay. China’s official response to Hamas’ deadly Oct. 7 assault on Israel has raised eyebrows. While the US was quick to condemn Hamas, Beijing failed to do so and only blamed the conflict on historic factors. It was perhaps Xi’s attempt to stand China apart from US policies, but it was also in sharp contrast to his predecessors’ attitudes. In the aftermath of Sept. 11, 2001, then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) unequivocally condemned terrorism and expressed China’s “deep sympathy and condolences” to the families of victims.
To be sure, there is still money and careers to be made. They can go deeper into China, serving clients there and fundraising locally, but they will have to deal with the government’s pervasive presence in the economy. Alternatively, they can stay with Western firms, leverage what they learned in China and build out investments into other emerging markets, but then they will just be another employee, who happens to be Chinese. The prized equity premium is gone.
Either way, being in a limbo, hoping for better US-China relations, is self-deceptive. It is time for sea turtles to pick the shore where they want to lay their eggs.
Shuli Ren is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian markets. A former investment banker, she was a markets reporter for Barron’s. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS