The Palestinian Islamic militant group Hamas launched a surprise attack on Israel on Oct. 7, leading to Israel’s declaration of war on and retaliation against Hamas. Both Israelis and Palestinians have suffered heavy losses, with countless losses of life and property.
Many comments have been made from the perspectives of national defense, international relations and so on, with arguments supporting either side.
In primary and secondary education, it could be a discussion topic for teachers to guide students to think deeply about the matter.
First, from a historical perspective, the five major wars in the Middle East since 1948 were Arab-Israeli conflicts involving political tensions, military conflict and other disputes between various Arab countries and Israel. During class, when time and the situation permit, teachers could bring this up and discuss the whole story and its impact on the world, such as the oil crisis leading to soaring prices.
Second, regarding this particular conflict, teachers could approach the topic from the perspectives of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and discuss the damage and impact of the war on the human rights of civilians.
Taiwan has signed these two conventions and made them part of its domestic law. However, the conventions remain in a regurgitated rote lesson stage in schools rather than being a part of civic awareness in real life.
Although human rights issues are integrated into the 12-year compulsory curriculum, they are not discussed in depth.
Since most students have learned about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through various media formats, timely integration of the issues into discussions should facilitate their further understanding.
BETTER DISCERNMENT
Lastly, it is also a chance to teach media literacy. Teachers could make students read relevant reports and then discern their stances — pro-Israel or pro-Palestine. Students could also examine the comments or videos on social media platforms to see if they are being manipulated through editing.
As many students have X (formerly known as Twitter) accounts, and there have been many reports about the rampant fake news on the platform, it would be helpful for students to acquire the ability to learn independently, as well as to understand the whole story of the event and its impact on the world.
Looking back to Taiwan’s history, conflicts, from those between the indigenous peoples and Han settlers to the armed conflicts between the settlers from China’s Guangdong and Fujian provinces in the mid-18th to late-19th centuries, were also mostly about competition for resources.
Teachers could guide students to reflect on their own history and think about the impact of these early armed conflicts on today’s Taiwanese culture, such as the custom of prohibiting marriages between people with the surname Cheng (鄭) and Shih (施), and then finally reflect on the relocation and settlement of the refugees after the war. I believe it would provide insight into our own history, as well as help students to better learn about international affairs.
Liu Yung-chien is an educator.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS