The COVID-19 pandemic seemed to worsen teens’ and adolescents’ mental health, according to several recent studies. Now, however, new research shows a reason for hope: Telehealth seems to be giving many more children access to support. That is a win worth celebrating. It should also push us to ensure virtual care is more permanently and equitably integrated into mental health services for minors.
The worrisome gap between children who need help and those who get it predates the pandemic. For example, the rate of major depression among children doubled between 2009 and 2019, and an estimated one in five kids have experienced a mental, emotional or behavioral disorder. Yet the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that just 20 percent of them get help from a specialized provider.
The new study, conducted by the public policy research group RAND Corp, found that telehealth use, which had been negligible among children before spring 2020, did far more than simply fill the void of in-person mental health visits that were suspended during the early COVID-19 shutdowns. Once telehealth became an option, use of mental health care rose — a trend that has persisted even as the pandemic has faded. Although in-person services were back up to 75 percent of their pre-pandemic levels by August last year, telehealth visits were 2,300 percent higher. Overall, that translated into nearly 22 percent higher usage than in January 2019.
The study has some limitations. The data only captures children with private insurance, and it is hard to know whether those with public insurance benefited equally. Most mental health providers do not accept public insurance. The researchers also cannot parse whether many more people got care, or if existing patients were more consistently seeing their therapist — that is something the team hopes to disentangle in future studies.
Yet the magnitude of the increase does suggest that more children had access to care than before the pandemic, says Mariah Kalmin, the RAND health policy researcher who led the study. Meanwhile, rates of usage and spending went up in lockstep, meaning this was not a more expensive form of care, she said.
A cynic might worry that insurers would look at this data and decide that telehealth is making it a little too easy for people to get needed care. Yet insurers should remember that an investment in mental health care today can translate into savings tomorrow. As I have written in the past, untreated anxiety can snowball into larger issues later in life; failure to address behavioral health issues can disrupt a child’s education and diminish their future success in the workforce.
Data have long suggested that phone or virtual appointments are just as effective as in-person visits, and that a telehealth option makes patients more likely to consistently connect with their therapist. During the pandemic, no-show rates dropped markedly.
While some adults might consider a virtual appointment less intimate than a face-to-face meeting with a therapist, it probably does not feel weird to teens — so many of their interactions already happen through devices.
“They’re comfortable through that space, so trying to provide behavioral health services adapted to the generation we’re trying to serve makes a lot of sense,” American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry president Warren Ng said.
Nor do adolescents and teens have to miss big chunks of their school day, or lose a whole afternoon of sports or activities, to travel to an appointment.
For parents, telehealth makes it easier to participate in their children’s plan of care. Every caregiver knows the challenge of juggling a job (or two) with daytime appointments. It is much easier to briefly duck out of the office for a virtual check-in with a child’s therapist.
None of this means that telehealth is always the best option for struggling kids. Schools are still an essential place for adolescents and teens experiencing anxiety or depression to be identified and treated.
There are also other challenges to accessing telehealth that must be addressed. Some of the pandemic-era services that might have made it easier to access, regardless of socioeconomic status, have been lost. For example, many children received free devices and access to the internet so they could participate in remote school — something that also opened the door to virtual visits with a therapist.
Another recent paper from researchers at Harvard Medical School found that black and Latin adolescents were less likely to be transitioned from in-person to virtual appointments during the pandemic than their white peers, a disparity that researchers think could be managed by a combination of better funding and clinician education.
The Harvard paper reiterated a point that has become abundantly clear in the past year: All children, regardless of race, ethnicity or socioeconomic status, are struggling, and all groups are experiencing a gap in care. Given the enormous need and the critical role telehealth could play, every effort should be made to ensure all kids can be met where they are.
There are plenty of changes from the pandemic that we can happily toss; readily accessible mental health services are among the things we should keep.
Lisa Jarvis is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering biotech, healthcare and the pharmaceutical industry. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS