At the beginning of this month, Japanese Councilor Muneo Suzuki, who is known for his pro-Russia stance, visited Moscow. His behavior caused an uproar in Japan, given that the Japanese government has urged its citizens to refrain from traveling to Russia amid the Russo-Ukrainian war.
As the first Japanese lawmaker to visit Moscow since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February last year, Suzuki held talks with Russian Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Andrey Rudenko and other officials. When interviewed by Russia’s state-owned news agency Sputnik, he said that he was 100 percent sure that Russia would win the war.
Although it was his opinion, Suzuki’s controversial statement could become propaganda for Russia. Japanese online accused him of betraying his country.
On Oct. 10, the Japan Innovation Party (JIP) expelled Suzuki for his unannounced Russia trip.
Suzuki hails from Hokkaido. Throughout his long political career, he has devoted himself to maintaining a friendly relationship with Russia. In April 2000, he visited Russia on behalf of then-Japanese prime minister Keizo Obuchi and met with then-Russian president-elect Vladimir Putin. It is generally believed that Suzuki was the first foreign politician Putin met after he won the election.
Suzuki naively thought that through his personal connections, Russia would be willing to give Japanese citizens permission to fish near the four southernmost Kuril Islands. He also believed that Russia would let Japanese who used to live on the four disputed islands return and pay tribute to their ancestors.
He was wrong.
Moscow and Russian officials responded to his wishes coldly. Snubbed, Suzuki could only return to Japan without achieving anything. Worse, he pushed his own country’s buttons.
According to the Sankei Shimbun, Suzuki’s trip this month should not be accepted because he publicly advocated for Russian aggression, with Moscow’s actions having been deemed a violation of international law.
An editorial in the Yomiuri Shimbun said that even though Suzuki is an opposition lawmaker, his reckless behavior went against the grain of Japan’s diplomatic policy and should not be tolerated.
During his most recent trip, Suzuki went along with Moscow’s official discourse and said that former Japanese prime minister Shinzo “Abe and Putin worked to create good Russia-Japan relations, but unfortunately in the last year, [Japanese] Prime Minister [Fumio] Kishida made things worse.”
Clearly, he broke diplomatic convention and disregarded one of the most important principles: “Politics stops at the water’s edge.”
In other words, when in Moscow, Suzuki revealed political problems at home to Russian officials, who would be able to use the reports to sow seeds of discord and polarization among Japanese politicians.
In this sense, Suzuki’s behavior cannot be considered a mere “different political opinion” in a democratic society. Neither his trip nor his remarks can be justified.
Suzuki has served eight consecutive terms as a lawmaker. He undoubtedly is a powerful leader of Japan’s local factions. His daughter, Takako Suzuki, who has been a Liberal Democratic Party lawmaker for four terms, is also an important figure. Because of his political power, the JIP did not rein him in.
The Yomiuri editorial said that Muneo Suzuki had more than once advocated for appeasing Russia, but his party did nothing to intervene or discipline him.
Possibly, given that he is a well-known politician, the party refrained from taking action against him for fear of harming itself.
As the editorial said, it was precisely because of the cadre in the JIP that Muneo Suzuki was given free rein, allowing him to become increasingly arrogant and opinionated.
He clearly damaged the national interests of Japan and the JIP has finally taken disciplinary action against him.
In Taiwan, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君) has been accused of leaking classified material about the Indigenous Defense Submarine program to a foreign state.
However, the KMT has repeatedly defended and protected her. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) has not commented on the issue and the party’s “blue fighters” faction continues to list her as a member.
This should have sounded alarm bells. Clearly, Ma and her friends will soon be eliminated by voters.
Chen Yung-chang is a company manager.
Translated by Emma Liu
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS