What are you doing to stop the imminent ethnic cleansing of Gaza? This is a serious question. If ever there was a time to stand up for the rights of an oppressed people, this is it, and yet, in many places in the West, you cannot. It has literally been outlawed. How is this even possible?
As I am writing this, Francesca Albanese, the UN special rapporteur on the occupied territories, is asking UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to demand that Israel stop its killing.
“The delay in calling on Israel to cease taking revenge on millions of Palestinian civilians is intensifying the descent into [the] abyss,” she wrote on X.
Illustration: Mountain People
Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians have been forcibly displaced by the Israeli military after the entire population of northern Gaza, about 1.1 million people, has been ordered to leave everything behind and move south. (Gaza’s population is mostly refugees from 1948 and some have refused to flee, having once lost their original homes 75 years ago.)
Israeli bombs have killed more than 2,670 people, at least 724 of whom were children, and every single member of 47 different Palestinian families — about 500 people, including dozens of children and babies — have been killed by Israeli airstrikes.
The term genocide, like fascism, is often flung around carelessly these days, but it is worth recalling that there is an official definition. The crime of genocide is “to destroy, in whole, or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.” No minimum number of victims is necessary to establish genocide, but the loss must be severe enough that it “will impact the group as a whole.” Since close to 50 families have already and horrifically been exterminated, and we are only just past the first week of this carnage, what other word should we choose?
The urgency to demonstrate against such horrors could not be more necessary. Yet our contemporary ambassadors of enlightenment have other ideas. Across the West, our political leadership has decided that freedom of opinion must be curtailed, that expressions of support for Palestinians reflexively equate to support for Hamas and terrorism, and that Palestinian narratives simply must be suppressed. These notions are not just hollow, they are dangerous.
French Minister of the Interior Gerald Darmanin sent a message to police banning pro-Palestinian protests. He wrote that “pro-Palestinian demonstrations must be prohibited because they are likely to generate disturbances to public order.”
Adopting this logic, I suppose we should amend the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Man to the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Man Unless Such Rights are Likely to Generate Disturbances to Public Order. Needless to say, government prohibitions on freedom of speech amount to censorship.
Berlin has also banned pro-Palestinian protests. Vienna banned pro-Palestinians protests. Several cities in Australia banned pro-Palestinian protests. In the UK, British Home Secretary Suella Braverman told senior police officers that waving a Palestinian flag or chanting specific phrases for Palestine might be a criminal offense.
It is one thing when those in power attempt to suppress your story by privileging another. It is quite another when they criminalize your story by false attribution and making everyone afraid of you.
That tens of thousands did march for Gaza in London, and protesters gathered across the UK, the US and other parts of the West, sometimes risking arrest, merely to express support for the Palestinians illustrates precisely the kind of courage that is needed right now.
At Brooklyn College, where I teach, the college president forced students protesting for Palestinian rights off campus, where they were met with a phalanx of police officers and a pro-Israel city councilor who came brandishing her own weapon.
In such an environment, supporting Palestinians in Gaza today — as they face depopulation, deportation and death — means putting your own life on the line. In fact, just being Palestinian can mean risking your life.
We already have a fatality in the US. In Plainfield, Illinois, six-year-old Wadea al-Fayoume was stabbed 26 times to death and his mother was also grievously harmed in a hate crime allegedly motivated because mother and child were Muslim at a time when the official discourse is telling the population that Muslims and Palestinians are to be hated.
How can we stop such horror?
There is pain everywhere right now. I feel it, too. In the past few days, a celebrated Gazan poet I know has lost 30 members of his family to Israeli bombs. A gifted Palestinian-American doctor, poet and translator I know has spoken powerfully about his grief after Israeli airstrikes killed 17 members of his family in Gaza. A highly respected colleague of mine in California has told us that his niece and her husband, residents of Kibbutz Nir Oz, have been abducted by Hamas, also clearly a war crime and an atrocity. Each one of these experiences matter. Our suffering is human and grief has no nationality.
But what about justice? How many times have we been lectured about so-called Western values? I am a person born and raised in the West. I am a Westerner and yet those so-called values are sounding very much like Gazans, Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims are utterly disposable. We hear Israel present the situation as if it has no choice but genocide, and we are expected to go along with this?
Never.
One can be opposed to Hamas, as I am, and to genocide, as I am. That is not hard to comprehend. That this has been made difficult or in some cases criminal to say, reveals just how superficial these so-called Western values actually have been, and how standing up for Palestine today is also to save the West from the very worst of itself.
Moustafa Bayoumi is the author of the award-winning books How Does It Feel to Be a Problem?: Being Young and Arab in America and This Muslim American Life: Dispatches from the War on Terror. He is a professor of English at Brooklyn College, City University of New York, and a contributing opinion writer at the Guardian US.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS