The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) held a meeting ahead of discussions to potentially hash out a pact between their presidential nominees, seeking to determine who is the “strongest presidential candidate”: New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) of the KMT or TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
With both parties holding firm to their stance and refusing to back down, no consensus was reached as Taiwan counts down to January’s election.
The TPP recommended hiring five polling organizations to conduct head-to-head polls between Ko and Hou, and determining the winner by averaging the polls, with half conducted by landline and half by mobile phone.
Former KMT secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰), Hou’s campaign manager, proposed an open primary, setting up polling stations in the 73 legislative constituencies across Taiwan.
People would have their national IDs checked and would have to sign a statement declaring that they “identify with the political direction to form an opposition alliance to oust the Democratic Progressive Party.”
While King tried to downplay the tight schedule, Ko said that an open primary has not been held in Taiwan for about 20 years and would be difficult to organize, expensive and problematic.
There are only 22 days left until Nov. 10, the deadline the KMT proposed for a primary. With all the challenges of expense, logistics and personnel requirements, it would be difficult to arrange a nationwide primary at such short notice.
Moreover, there are dangers that turnout would be low and the process would be interfered with.
There is also a high likelihood of a lack of representation in the results, bringing more trouble and controversy than it is worth.
Furthermore, while the TPP’s forte is new media, cyberspace and interaction with young people, the KMT’s local factions exert considerable influence over elections, making the idea of an open primary a “rigged” game, with the odds clearly favoring the KMT.
Even if the open primary system has been used for years in other democratic countries, King’s proposal is unrealistic and impractical given the circumstances and the fast-approaching deadline.
King either has his head in the clouds or harbors a malicious agenda.
As a century-old party, the KMT’s “big-brother mindset” has led it to propose the fanciful idea of an open primary to force the TPP into an unfair game. If the TPP does not concede, it would risk being labeled a “troublemaker” for undermining potential collaboration, while the KMT would have the perfect excuse if it loses at the polls in January.
If things do not go its way in the presidential election without a deal with the TPP, the KMT would have no qualms about passing the buck to the younger party.
Despite King’s image, he has failed to give the problem a “clean-cut” solution, instead inciting a “knives out” mentality and complicating the plan to collaborate.
The “blue” and “white” political camps seem to need each other, but proposals for their future together might be futile.
A plan for the KMT and the TPP to unify is a charade. It might be nothing but a dream founded on a “game of thrones.”
Su Wei-cheng is a lecturer and a former secretary to the president of the Legislative Yuan.
Translated by Rita Wang
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS