The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) held a meeting ahead of discussions to potentially hash out a pact between their presidential nominees, seeking to determine who is the “strongest presidential candidate”: New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) of the KMT or TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
With both parties holding firm to their stance and refusing to back down, no consensus was reached as Taiwan counts down to January’s election.
The TPP recommended hiring five polling organizations to conduct head-to-head polls between Ko and Hou, and determining the winner by averaging the polls, with half conducted by landline and half by mobile phone.
Former KMT secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰), Hou’s campaign manager, proposed an open primary, setting up polling stations in the 73 legislative constituencies across Taiwan.
People would have their national IDs checked and would have to sign a statement declaring that they “identify with the political direction to form an opposition alliance to oust the Democratic Progressive Party.”
While King tried to downplay the tight schedule, Ko said that an open primary has not been held in Taiwan for about 20 years and would be difficult to organize, expensive and problematic.
There are only 22 days left until Nov. 10, the deadline the KMT proposed for a primary. With all the challenges of expense, logistics and personnel requirements, it would be difficult to arrange a nationwide primary at such short notice.
Moreover, there are dangers that turnout would be low and the process would be interfered with.
There is also a high likelihood of a lack of representation in the results, bringing more trouble and controversy than it is worth.
Furthermore, while the TPP’s forte is new media, cyberspace and interaction with young people, the KMT’s local factions exert considerable influence over elections, making the idea of an open primary a “rigged” game, with the odds clearly favoring the KMT.
Even if the open primary system has been used for years in other democratic countries, King’s proposal is unrealistic and impractical given the circumstances and the fast-approaching deadline.
King either has his head in the clouds or harbors a malicious agenda.
As a century-old party, the KMT’s “big-brother mindset” has led it to propose the fanciful idea of an open primary to force the TPP into an unfair game. If the TPP does not concede, it would risk being labeled a “troublemaker” for undermining potential collaboration, while the KMT would have the perfect excuse if it loses at the polls in January.
If things do not go its way in the presidential election without a deal with the TPP, the KMT would have no qualms about passing the buck to the younger party.
Despite King’s image, he has failed to give the problem a “clean-cut” solution, instead inciting a “knives out” mentality and complicating the plan to collaborate.
The “blue” and “white” political camps seem to need each other, but proposals for their future together might be futile.
A plan for the KMT and the TPP to unify is a charade. It might be nothing but a dream founded on a “game of thrones.”
Su Wei-cheng is a lecturer and a former secretary to the president of the Legislative Yuan.
Translated by Rita Wang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS