The killing of more than 1,300 innocent Israelis and other nationals in an unprecedented brutal terrorist attack by Hamas on Oct. 7, as well as the kidnapping of more than 150 soldiers and civilians, including women and children, has shaken the world.
Israel’s retaliatory military operation to achieve “a complete siege of the Gaza Strip” has in turn continued to rage.
While the Israeli government has claimed it had recaptured the Gaza borders from the control of Hamas, the current spell of the Israel-Palestine conflict will have a profound impact on the geopolitical dynamics of the Middle East and the rest of the world.
The genesis of the conflict between Israel and Palestine goes back to 1948, when the creation of Israel as an independent nation out of the British Mandate for Palestine led to the first Arab-Israel war.
The entry of Hamas — a terrorist organization — into the political space of Palestine in 2006 and its subsequent control over the Gaza Strip intensified the conflict.
However, this time Hamas’ heinous crimes have assumed huge importance for several reasons:
First, firing 5,000 missiles at Israel in 20 minutes, Hamas aimed to destroy the perception that Israel’s Iron Dome — its missile defense system — is impenetrable.
Second, Hamas also wanted to demonstrate its military capabilities.
Third, by capturing and killing civilians, Hamas wanted to leave an everlasting horror in the minds of Israelis.
Fourth, as Hamas had begun to feel isolated because of the Abraham Accords signed by Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain, and peace talks between Israel and Saudi Arabia, it aimed to garner the support of Arab and Muslim states for the cause of Palestine.
Fifth, some experts also believe that Hamas was encouraged by the Russia-Iran-China axis to launch an attack to divert US attention and resources from Ukraine and the Indo-Pacific region.
Although the international community has remained a votary of the establishment of an independent and sovereign state of Palestine, Hamas’ outrageous terrorist act has drawn worldwide condemnation.
Surprisingly, China, which projects itself as a peacemaker in the Middle East, has distanced itself from criticizing Hamas.
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs initially issued a neutral statement calling on “relevant parties to remain calm, exercise restraint and immediately end the hostilities to protect civilians and avoid further deterioration of the situation.”
Although China strengthened its statement to condemn “all violence and attacks on civilians” after a meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and US Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, it has not shown willingness to play the role of mediator between Israel and Hamas.
This has surprised many because in June, China expressed a desire to contribute toward resolving the Palestine-Israel conflict. Its move was taken seriously against the backdrop of Beijing’s success in brokering a peace deal between Saudi Arabia and Iran.
China’s muted response to Hamas’ terror acts has revealed its true image and its limitations as a peacemaker in the Middle East.
As Iran supports Hamas, Beijing does not want to jeopardize its economic, energy and other interests with Tehran by condemning Hamas as a terrorist organization. After all, China has nearly US$400 billion of planned investments in Iran in the next few decades.
China also has a strong strategic and economic relationship with Palestine. From 2019 to last year, bilateral trade surged 57 percent to US$6.41 billion.
China is finding it difficult to play the role of mediator between Palestine and Israel without negatively affecting its economic and other interests in the region.
Moreover, it is still not ready to get involved in conflict-resolution exercises in any major global issues, for example, the Palestine-Israel conflict and the Ukraine war.
Although China has aggressively pursued the modernization of its military, it still appears reluctant or is not in a position to relocate its military resources between regions in a short time to restore peace and security.
While the USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier strike group was immediately dispatched to the eastern Mediterranean Sea to deter Iran, Lebanon’s Hezbollah and any other actor across the region from exploiting the situation, China — an aspiring superpower — is happy to appeal to the international community to resolve the conflict.
Taiwan is closely watching the Hamas-Israel war even as it faces security threats from China.
Beijing has increased its activity around Taiwan, conducting two large rounds of war games over the past year, so the missile attack by Hamas has prompted Taipei to consider detailed plans to protect itself if faced with a similar attack from China.
It is in this context that Taiwan has established a working group to draw lessons from the Hamas attack.
Another important issue that should attract Taiwan’s attention is Israel’s ability to mobilize more than 300,000 reservists in a short time and its effective retaliation against Hamas.
While US support for Ukraine and Israel has sent a strong message about its commitment to protecting Taiwan, Taipei needs to be more vigilant against China’s military adventurism, because Beijing might try to use the US’ attention on the Middle East as an opportunity to intensify its assertive military posturing. The government should bolster its intelligence-gathering apparatus.
While lessons from the Hamas attack can help Taiwan’s retaliatory capabilities, China’s cold-handed approach to the crisis in the Middle East and the US-led global support to Israel will be a big deterrent for Taiwan against China.
By condemning the Hamas terror attack, Taipei has shown its commitment to peace, security, development and democracy. Hopefully the international community will realize the need to reciprocate by consolidating close ties with Taiwan.
Sumit Kumar is an assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Delhi and a former Ministry of Foreign Affairs visiting fellow at National Chengchi University.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS