US domestic oil production hit an all-time high last week, contrasting with efforts to slice heat-trapping carbon emissions by the administration of US President Joe Biden and world leaders.
And it conflicts with oft-repeated Republican talking points of a Biden “war on American energy.”
The US Department of Energy’s Energy Information Administration (EIA) reported that US oil production in the first week of October hit 13.2 million barrels per day, passing the previous record set in 2020 by 100,000 barrels. Weekly domestic oil production has doubled from the first week in October 2012 to now.
With the UN and scientists saying the world needs to cut carbon emissions — from burning coal, oil and natural gas — by 43 percent by 2030 and down to zero or close to it by 2050, several developed countries across the world are dangerously producing more, not less, fossil fuels, experts say.
“Continuing to expand oil and gas production is hypocritical and not at all consistent with the global call to phase down fossil fuels,” said climate scientist Bill Hare, chief executive officer of Climate Analytics, which helps track global actions and policies to curb climate change. “The US support for expanded fossil fuel production will undermine global efforts to reduce emissions.”
The US is not alone in this.
Hare pointed to Norway, Australia, the UK and Canada, adding France because of support of Courbevoie-based multinational TotalEnergies.
Moreover, the designated president of upcoming climate negotiations heads the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) national oil company, which has announced plans to boost drilling.
‘CATASTROPHE’
“From ExxonMobil to Shell, Guyana to Cote d’Ivorie [Ivory Coast], those with fossil resources seek to boost production and delay action to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions,” said Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor John Sterman, a senior adviser at Climate Interactive, an organization that models future warming based on countries’ proposed actions.
That path will lead to “catastrophe,” Sterman said.
Stanford University climate scientist Rob Jackson, who heads emissions-tallying group Global Carbon Project, said that no country or company wants to cut oil and gas production if someone else is going to sell oil anyway.
“We’re in a fossil trap,” Jackson said.
White House officials have long considered increased oil production inside the US as a bridge to help soften the transition to renewable energy sources. Officials have closely tracked domestic production, noting that output has risen by an average of more than 1 million barrels a day over the past year. It is evidence that many of the oil price increases reflect the policy choices of other countries including Saudi Arabia on what is a globally priced commodity.
The Biden administration has committed several hundred billions of dollars in government incentives for moving away from fossil fuels to limit the damage from climate change.
Just because the US is increasing oil production, that does not mean it will not phase down emissions, said Samantha Gross, director of energy security and climate at the Washington-based Brookings Institution.
US oil is less carbon-intensive than other oil, an argument that the UAE’s oil company also makes, Gross said.
“So long as oil is demanded, demand drives production — we need to change the whole system to reduce oil demand,” she said.
“Replacing oil in power production is a lot easier than replacing oil in transportation,” she wrote in an e-mail. “We need changes in the transportation sector, along with policies to reduce demand for transport — like teleworking, walkable neighborhoods and good public transportation.”
The Energy Information Administration in a separate document predicted that global carbon emissions will rise, not plummet, through 2050.
‘MILLIONS DEAD’
“If the EIA is right, we’ll add another trillion tons of [carbon dioxide] pollution to the atmosphere by 2050 and millions of people will die,” Jackson said. “There’s no other way to see it.”
Republican senators and representatives, including the US House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee, this year have repeated the phrase “Biden’s war on American energy.”
Jared Bernstein, chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, last month pushed back on that.
“There are thousands of available permits — places where oil companies could drill,” Bernstein said. “They’ve been highly profitable. They’ve been highly productive. So, I don’t think that’s the problem.”
Jackson said that the Biden administration has swung back and forth on energy exploration, approving the Willow oil project in Alaska, but canceling drilling permits in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
“It’s clear that the Biden administration is not running a war against fossil fuels, or if it is, it’s a very unsuccessful war,” Hare said.
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s hypersonic missile carried a simple message to the West over Ukraine: Back off, and if you do not, Russia reserves the right to hit US and British military facilities. Russia fired a new intermediate-range hypersonic ballistic missile known as “Oreshnik,” or Hazel Tree, at Ukraine on Thursday in what Putin said was a direct response to strikes on Russia by Ukrainian forces with US and British missiles. In a special statement from the Kremlin just after 8pm in Moscow that day, the Russian president said the war was escalating toward a global conflict, although he avoided any nuclear
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
RSS