A big frustration of writing about climate change is that it is wildly difficult to get people to care about the subject unless they happen to be, say, unexpectedly choking on wildfire smoke hundreds of kilometers from the nearest wildfire or escaping a flooded basement after a random rainstorm turns Biblical.
The sense of failing to convey to your stovetop mates that you are all boiling alive was hammered home last week by a new survey showing that young people — humanity’s hope for the future, supposedly — care more about inflation than they do about climate change.
This in the middle of what will probably be the hottest year in human history, wracked with deadly floods, droughts, heat waves and wildfires.
Illustration: Mountain People
On the one hand, this suggests “climate Cassandra” is a poor career choice. On the other, it makes total sense.
Although my memories of young adulthood are hazy, one lingering sensation is relentless financial dread. And today’s youths have it far worse than I ever did. College, healthcare and housing expenses have soared in the past few decades, followed by food and other prices since the COVID-19 pandemic. It is tough to focus on the future of the climate when your stomach is grumbling and you are not sure you can cover the rent.
However, the reality is that climate change and inflation are increasingly, inextricably linked. A hotter planet makes droughts, floods, heat waves and destructive storms more likely and more intense. Rainfall patterns change and diseases roam more widely. All of this in turn disrupts agriculture, construction, shipping, manufacturing and more.
Natural disasters and rising sea levels will leave some parts of the US inhabitable only by the very wealthy, making affordable housing even more scarce.
The pandemic’s inflationary supply-chain nightmares were just a preview of what might be in store.
One heat wave alone boosted European food prices by 0.67 percent last year, according to a recent study by the European Central Bank and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
Future warming could raise global food inflation by 0.9 to 3.3 percent a year by 2035, the study suggested, depending partly on how hot we let the planet get by then.
Total inflation could be 0.3 to 1.2 percent higher a year. Food inflation is typically more volatile than “headline” inflation; hence the bigger potential swings.
Global corn production could fall 6 percent by the end of the century under even the most optimistic carbon emissions forecasts, according to a 2021 study by NASA and a host of other researchers. And most of that effect would happen before 2040.
By that time, every county in Iowa will experience at least a 45 percent increase in the number of days under corn-killing temperatures, according to a study by New York-based non-profit the Environmental Defense Fund.
This summer in the US alone, everyone from Nebraska cattle ranchers to Long Island, New York, kelp harvesters suffered lower yields as land and sea broiled under record temperatures.
A June study in the journal Nature warned that wheat growers in the US and China are not prepared for just how much more destructive future heat waves will be.
Meanwhile, storms, water shortages and power failures will disrupt manufacturing. Heat will threaten the health of farm, construction and other outdoor workers and trigger demands for higher pay and better conditions. Shrinking rivers will slow container shipping. Millions of US homes are at risk of catastrophic flooding and their owners do not even know it.
All of this spells supply headaches and higher prices.
Technology can help us adapt to a hotter future, at least somewhat. Farmers can use land and water more efficiently and breed heat-resistant crop strains. Businesses can weatherproof their infrastructure and diversify their supply chains.
However, all of that will be pricey, at least in the short term, adding still more inflationary pressure. Developing nations will struggle to keep up without expensive assistance from the developed world.
Fending off the worst of climate change, and the inflation and disruption it brings, will not be cheap, either, of course. Limiting global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial averages could cost nearly US$200 trillion in green investments by 2050, Bloomberg NEF has estimated.
That also sounds pretty inflationary, but in the meantime it will generate economic growth, spur new technologies and industries, and prevent even greater amounts of future death, destruction and — for some of us worst of all — inflation.
Mark Gongloff is a Bloomberg Opinion editor and columnist covering climate change. He previously worked for Fortune.com, the Huffington Post and the Wall Street Journal.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS