A big frustration of writing about climate change is that it is wildly difficult to get people to care about the subject unless they happen to be, say, unexpectedly choking on wildfire smoke hundreds of kilometers from the nearest wildfire or escaping a flooded basement after a random rainstorm turns Biblical.
The sense of failing to convey to your stovetop mates that you are all boiling alive was hammered home last week by a new survey showing that young people — humanity’s hope for the future, supposedly — care more about inflation than they do about climate change.
This in the middle of what will probably be the hottest year in human history, wracked with deadly floods, droughts, heat waves and wildfires.
Illustration: Mountain People
On the one hand, this suggests “climate Cassandra” is a poor career choice. On the other, it makes total sense.
Although my memories of young adulthood are hazy, one lingering sensation is relentless financial dread. And today’s youths have it far worse than I ever did. College, healthcare and housing expenses have soared in the past few decades, followed by food and other prices since the COVID-19 pandemic. It is tough to focus on the future of the climate when your stomach is grumbling and you are not sure you can cover the rent.
However, the reality is that climate change and inflation are increasingly, inextricably linked. A hotter planet makes droughts, floods, heat waves and destructive storms more likely and more intense. Rainfall patterns change and diseases roam more widely. All of this in turn disrupts agriculture, construction, shipping, manufacturing and more.
Natural disasters and rising sea levels will leave some parts of the US inhabitable only by the very wealthy, making affordable housing even more scarce.
The pandemic’s inflationary supply-chain nightmares were just a preview of what might be in store.
One heat wave alone boosted European food prices by 0.67 percent last year, according to a recent study by the European Central Bank and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
Future warming could raise global food inflation by 0.9 to 3.3 percent a year by 2035, the study suggested, depending partly on how hot we let the planet get by then.
Total inflation could be 0.3 to 1.2 percent higher a year. Food inflation is typically more volatile than “headline” inflation; hence the bigger potential swings.
Global corn production could fall 6 percent by the end of the century under even the most optimistic carbon emissions forecasts, according to a 2021 study by NASA and a host of other researchers. And most of that effect would happen before 2040.
By that time, every county in Iowa will experience at least a 45 percent increase in the number of days under corn-killing temperatures, according to a study by New York-based non-profit the Environmental Defense Fund.
This summer in the US alone, everyone from Nebraska cattle ranchers to Long Island, New York, kelp harvesters suffered lower yields as land and sea broiled under record temperatures.
A June study in the journal Nature warned that wheat growers in the US and China are not prepared for just how much more destructive future heat waves will be.
Meanwhile, storms, water shortages and power failures will disrupt manufacturing. Heat will threaten the health of farm, construction and other outdoor workers and trigger demands for higher pay and better conditions. Shrinking rivers will slow container shipping. Millions of US homes are at risk of catastrophic flooding and their owners do not even know it.
All of this spells supply headaches and higher prices.
Technology can help us adapt to a hotter future, at least somewhat. Farmers can use land and water more efficiently and breed heat-resistant crop strains. Businesses can weatherproof their infrastructure and diversify their supply chains.
However, all of that will be pricey, at least in the short term, adding still more inflationary pressure. Developing nations will struggle to keep up without expensive assistance from the developed world.
Fending off the worst of climate change, and the inflation and disruption it brings, will not be cheap, either, of course. Limiting global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial averages could cost nearly US$200 trillion in green investments by 2050, Bloomberg NEF has estimated.
That also sounds pretty inflationary, but in the meantime it will generate economic growth, spur new technologies and industries, and prevent even greater amounts of future death, destruction and — for some of us worst of all — inflation.
Mark Gongloff is a Bloomberg Opinion editor and columnist covering climate change. He previously worked for Fortune.com, the Huffington Post and the Wall Street Journal.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS