Almost 10 million Taiwanese aged 15 or older, or 48.8 percent of the population, had higher education of a sort, an increase on previous years, as of the end of last year, according to a report released by the Ministry of Education in April.
Taiwan has a population of just more than 23 million people, which means that almost one in every two Taiwanese has been educated to university level.
Taiwan, then, is a “highly cultivated” nation, but is that really the case?
Causing chaos, cutting in line, indiscriminate littering and discarding cigarette butts on the street, speaking loudly on the phone and loutish behavior are part of the everyday experience in Taiwan.
What happened to all that education and cultivation?
During the Double Ten National Day holiday weekend, a woman took the high-speed rail with her family and saw a table full of trash left by a passenger, including used tissues and leftover coffee. At first, she started cleaning the mess up, but she was uncomfortable about touching the tissues and a stirrer used by someone else, so she asked an attendant for help.
The woman said that taking away your garbage when you ride the high-speed rail is just basic manners, and she could not understand why some people do not seem to be able to do this.
A former high-speed rail employee said that he had also seen used tissues left on seats and that it was disgusting.
It is not just the high-speed rail: There have been numerous examples on trains operated by the Taiwan Railways Administration.
There are tales of a woman using the pillow cover of the seat as a napkin while eating food, another passenger using the pillow cover to clean their shoes, while another took it home as a souvenir. Then there are the passengers who take off their shoes and socks, cross their legs and plant their feet on another person’s seat. The mind boggles.
If this kind of thing happened 50 years ago, we could perhaps attribute it to ignorance and lack of education. That no longer applies.
Decent behavior in public is not rocket science, it merely requires a bit of self-discipline, empathy and an understanding of the importance of not making life difficult for others. At its simplest level, public morality is self-awareness without the need of being reminded to behave appropriately by those around you.
Unfortunately, many Taiwanese lack the kind of introspection that this requires and do things their own way without a single thought for whether their selfish actions would trouble others.
Lacking this kind of self-discipline and self-reflection, how can people be expected to act as decent citizens or benefit from education? They might have been highly educated, but, as the saying goes, “all that glitters is not gold.”
Nothing beats a good upbringing at home and moral education.
So-called “competency-based education” is not enough, schools also need to instill in students an awareness of how to behave properly, so that they internalize it and make it habitual.
Shiao Fu-song is a lecturer at National Taitung University.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not