Despite the atrocious, deadly attack on Israel by Hamas, Israelis did not hop on the first plane out of the country. Indeed, many Jews living abroad returned to defend their homeland, with Beirut airport overwhelmed with Israeli compatriots.
In sharp contrast to Israelis’ patriotism, if China were to attack Taiwan, there is no doubt that people who support China in Taiwan would bolt immediately. Their cowardice would hardly come as a surprise, for their forefathers had been opportunists themselves.
A woman identified only by the surname Tsai (蔡) was with a group of Taiwanese visiting Jerusalem on Saturday when she witnessed several rockets flying through the sky from a distance. She thanked the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for its assistance in helping them return early, and also thanked the travel agency for providing emergency relief.
Upon returning to Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport, she called her friends and family to let them know that she was safe. After the experience, she said she thinks Taiwanese are far too relaxed with their soft living and should become more vigilant about a potential attack.
Israelis should become an example for Taiwanese to think about the dangers of complacency and the importance of solidarity in countering China and safeguarding Taiwan’s territory. The public should not be naive and believe that the slogan “anti-war” is enough to keep China at bay, as if it were some kind of talisman.
As for the pro-China wimps, no one should expect more from them than running at the first sign of war.
Taiwanese should know that the fight is more about maintaining democracy and freedom and less about opposing unification.
It is not about fighting for the cause of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), which used to have people stupidly promoting the agenda of former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) and the party’s interests.
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Rita Wang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS