Taiwanese are not the best at critical thinking and often lack a sufficient understanding of public policy. This leads to unsatisfactory governance and management performances. Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) approval ratings are evidence of this. Taiwanese need to ask themselves what kind of president they want.
First, to face hardship, at home and abroad, Taiwan needs a president who is firm, rational, persistent, courageous and wise. Such a leader must lead the nation out of its current predicament. It does not need a person who is reckless, impatient and unthinking.
Second, Taiwan needs a president with a firm command of foreign affairs, specifically cross-strait relations and international diplomacy. They must be able to connect Taiwan with the international community to come up with ways to enhancing national defense. They should keep improving Taiwan’s programs to domestically manufacture warships, but must also know how to communicate with China to maintain cross-strait peace. The president should not trigger further conflict in the region.
Third, Taiwan needs a president who can maintain and bolster relations with the US to ensure the nation’s safety. Over the past few years, Taiwan has not agitated China, and the situation in the Strait has not changed as a result. Meanwhile, it has won the trust of the US, with the US Congress passing the Taiwan Travel Act, the Taiwan Assurance Act and provisions related to Taiwan in the National Defense Authorization Act.
Fourth, Taiwan needs a president with experience in managing finance, renewable energy, environmental issues, education and social welfare. Taiwan is facing a series of problems including an economic transition, insufficient investment, difficulty in participating in regional economic activities, wealth disparities, green-energy development, and the effects of an aging society and low birthrate. The president should be able to boost the economy, lessen wealth inequality, mitigate generational gaps, enhance the quality of education and environment, and institute social welfare programs.
Taiwanese cannot elect a person who lacks a comprehensive vision, nor can they vote for a politician who cannot govern a city — one who is instead focused on being fun and sensationalist, and who speaks rashly and causes problems.
Fifth, Taiwan needs a president who can carry out reforms and adhere to progressive values. With the return of former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) as part of a deep-blue conservative force, Taiwan needs a leader who can establish cultural and social values in a more profound way to transform Taiwan into a modern nation.
Ko in no way meets those five requirements. His performance shows that he is not qualified to be a national leader. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) knows well that Ko is less capable than its candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), and even less capable than Vice President William Lai (賴清德), the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) presidential candidate.
However, to win the presidential election by collaborating with Ko, the KMT dares not challenge him. Now, Ko is taking advantage of the pan-blue camp, advocating for strategic voting. Former KMT secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰), Hou’s campaign manager, could not oppose Ko’s scheme and hence proposed adopting a US-style primary election to save the KMT.
To prevent Ko from mobilizing young voters and pan-blue camp supporters, the approval ratings of the pan-white and pan-blue camps need to be kept in balance.
That would minimize Ko’s effect on Lai, so that the DPP can win the presidential election.
Michael Lin is a retired diplomat who served in the US.
Translated by Emma Liu
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS