The president’s post at Da-Yeh University (大葉大學) in Changhua County’s Dacun Township (大村) has been vacant for almost a year. Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Fan Yun (范雲) has criticized the Ministry of Education, saying it should have done more to fill the post. Fan suggested that the selection of a president at a private university should be the same as at public universities. In response, Minister of Education Pan Wen-chung (潘文忠) said the ministry has been looking for a suitable person to be the acting president.
In 2005, the Legislative Yuan already proposed that a private university’s president should be selected in the same way as a public university’s president. How a selection committee would be formed should also be the same: university representatives, alumni and third parties from the general public should be proportionally recruited. However, the Ministry of Education has not yet implemented these regulations.
Da-Yeh University was founded more than 30 years ago. Most members of the public would agree that it is a reputable university. It has held the National Intercollegiate Athletic Games, and its students have won several awards from international contests, including the Red Dot Design Award. It is regrettable that in recent years, due to a succession of different presidents, the administration and staff of the university have been shifting. The university has been affected by this unstable situation, and its performance has been declining accordingly.
Da-Yeh University has been without a president since November last year, but without any regulation, the board members have failed to select a president and the problem has remained unaddressed. The main reason can be found in the Private School Act (私立學校法). Its Article 32 specifies: “Resolutions reached at board meetings shall be carried out only with over half the board members in attendance and over half the board members in attendance voting on them. Resolutions having to do with the following shall be carried out only with at least two-thirds of the board members in attendance and over half the board members in attendance voting on them: first, re-election and by-election of board members; second, election, re-election and by-election of the president; and third, employment or removal of the schoolmaster.”
The law specifies that the board members are entitled to select a president, and most members would not give up this right, but if a consensus cannot be reached at the board meetings, it would be extremely difficult to choose a president. Moreover, if some board members have an ulterior motive, or if the process leads to conflict and division, the university will certainly be negatively affected.
When Da-Yeh University was established in 1990, the government was supportive of the establishment of private universities — the more, the better. In Changhua County, examples include Chung Chou University of Science and Technology, Mingdao University, Da-Yeh University and Chienkuo Technology University. Chung Chou University of Science and Technology and Mingdao University have both been ordered to shut down by the Ministry of Education. Changhua residents would not want to see another private university meet the same fate.
Many lecturers and staff have remained loyal to Da-Yeh University. They want the board to keep the autonomy of the university intact. Hopefully, the family that contributed to the founding of the university can respect professionals and abide by the law. The board members should recognize the essence of the university, and students’ rights should be given priority. Only by doing so can the name Da-Yeh shine again.
Chang Huey-por is a former president of National Changhua University of Education.
Translated by Emma Liu
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS