The president’s post at Da-Yeh University (大葉大學) in Changhua County’s Dacun Township (大村) has been vacant for almost a year. Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Fan Yun (范雲) has criticized the Ministry of Education, saying it should have done more to fill the post. Fan suggested that the selection of a president at a private university should be the same as at public universities. In response, Minister of Education Pan Wen-chung (潘文忠) said the ministry has been looking for a suitable person to be the acting president.
In 2005, the Legislative Yuan already proposed that a private university’s president should be selected in the same way as a public university’s president. How a selection committee would be formed should also be the same: university representatives, alumni and third parties from the general public should be proportionally recruited. However, the Ministry of Education has not yet implemented these regulations.
Da-Yeh University was founded more than 30 years ago. Most members of the public would agree that it is a reputable university. It has held the National Intercollegiate Athletic Games, and its students have won several awards from international contests, including the Red Dot Design Award. It is regrettable that in recent years, due to a succession of different presidents, the administration and staff of the university have been shifting. The university has been affected by this unstable situation, and its performance has been declining accordingly.
Da-Yeh University has been without a president since November last year, but without any regulation, the board members have failed to select a president and the problem has remained unaddressed. The main reason can be found in the Private School Act (私立學校法). Its Article 32 specifies: “Resolutions reached at board meetings shall be carried out only with over half the board members in attendance and over half the board members in attendance voting on them. Resolutions having to do with the following shall be carried out only with at least two-thirds of the board members in attendance and over half the board members in attendance voting on them: first, re-election and by-election of board members; second, election, re-election and by-election of the president; and third, employment or removal of the schoolmaster.”
The law specifies that the board members are entitled to select a president, and most members would not give up this right, but if a consensus cannot be reached at the board meetings, it would be extremely difficult to choose a president. Moreover, if some board members have an ulterior motive, or if the process leads to conflict and division, the university will certainly be negatively affected.
When Da-Yeh University was established in 1990, the government was supportive of the establishment of private universities — the more, the better. In Changhua County, examples include Chung Chou University of Science and Technology, Mingdao University, Da-Yeh University and Chienkuo Technology University. Chung Chou University of Science and Technology and Mingdao University have both been ordered to shut down by the Ministry of Education. Changhua residents would not want to see another private university meet the same fate.
Many lecturers and staff have remained loyal to Da-Yeh University. They want the board to keep the autonomy of the university intact. Hopefully, the family that contributed to the founding of the university can respect professionals and abide by the law. The board members should recognize the essence of the university, and students’ rights should be given priority. Only by doing so can the name Da-Yeh shine again.
Chang Huey-por is a former president of National Changhua University of Education.
Translated by Emma Liu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS