Thick haze blotting out the sun in Singapore and Malaysia is an early warning sign that one of the world’s more ambitious attempts to bend commodity markets to political and environmental imperatives is failing.
The smoke comes from thousands of wildfires burning on the islands of Borneo and Sumatra. The causes of such blazes can be complex, but clearing forest to make way for palm oil has long been rampant in Southeast Asia. A combination of climatic, economic and political circumstances right now in Indonesia, the biggest producer, make conditions unusually favorable for a devastating season. For the EU, which has struggled for years to stamp out unsustainable palm cultivation, that would represent a humiliating setback.
There is already circumstantial evidence that plantations would spread as a result of the recent fire weather. NASA satellite imagery recorded last week shows extensive burns around the city of Banjarbaru in South Kalimantan province on Borneo in areas where native forest abuts stands of oil palm. Claims of progress in halting Indonesian deforestation over the past decade might simply be the result of a run of wet years that made it harder to burn off native vegetation.
That situation has reversed this year. Hot, dry weather has spread across Southeast Asia in recent months thanks to the confluence of El Nino and a positive Indian Ocean dipole, two oceanic climate cycles that parch the region. In such circumstances, even fires started accidentally can build into damaging conflagrations.
Accidents often get a helping hand from human intervention, and economic circumstances right now are certainly favoring that. The price of palm oil closely tracks that of crude oil, thanks to its extensive usage as biodiesel. As a result, Riyadh and Moscow’s push to increase their petroleum export revenues is also making Indonesian palm plantations more profitable.
Jakarta, meanwhile, lifted its blending mandate for domestic gas stations in February so that 35 percent of each liter must come from biofuels, and would move to a 50 percent target for 2025. Indonesia’s palm production is already up more than 10 percent since the 2019-2020 crop year. Price and demand factors suggest it would push higher in the years ahead.
The final factor is politics. Indonesia has been attempting to crack down on deforestation for some time, but enforcement has been patchy at best. According to one 2020 study, that is often due to electoral considerations. Logging and burning tends to be highest in regions that have upcoming local ballots, since governors and officials recognize that cracking down on farmers’ livelihoods is a bad strategy for winning votes.
The coming year could be a bumper one for Indonesian democracy, with a closely fought general election due in February followed by polls for every major local post in November. In a polity riddled with vote-buying, that provides ample opportunities for candidates to turn a blind eye to lucrative land-clearing.
What is to be done about this? The EU, for decades a top-five consumer of palm oil, has tried to crack down on the trade. The fight is vital to preventing tropical deforestation, which caused emissions equivalent to those from India last year. Food-labeling rules were introduced in 2014 and a new anti-deforestation law was passed by Brussels this year, underpinning a promise to phase out palm biodiesel by 2030.
Despite a recent fall in consumption within the EU, there has been little discernible effect at the global level; palm production has more than doubled over the past decade. Most of the additional liters are going to supply burgeoning domestic consumption in Indonesia and, to a lesser extent, Malaysia. Tropical producer countries, meanwhile, regard Brussels’ restrictions as little better than protectionism for Europe’s domestic rapeseed and sunflower industries. A case brought at the WTO might be decided before the end of the year.
What would be a better approach to ending this cycle of deforestation and lax enforcement? German and Spanish subsidies for solar installations in the 2000s played a major part in turning photovoltaic panels into the green success story of the 2010s and 2020s. As grids sucked up renewable power instead, fossil fuel consumption was constrained.
There is a lesson in that. Instead of slowing down the electric vehicle revolution with measures like the probe into Chinese exports announced last month, Brussels should redouble its efforts to accelerate it. As drivers switch away from liquid fuels, long-run demand for palm oil (and the incentive to clear more land) would shrink. That could especially be the case if better local charging infrastructure and more battery-powered two-wheelers can electrify Indonesia’s own roads. Funding to achieve that end would mesh with Jakarta’s ambitions to turn its forests into a carbon sink by 2030 and become a crucial supplier of raw materials for the energy transition.
Europe’s mistake in dealing with palm oil has been the same one that prohibitionists have always made: Attempting to limit supplies, when demand is the real source of the problem. It is time for a different approach.
David Fickling is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering energy and commodities. Previously, he worked for Bloomberg News, the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s