A few days before this year’s Double Ten National Day celebration, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said he would not attend the official ceremony because he did not want his presence to be viewed as “an endorsement of Taiwanese independence.”
Yet on the day of the celebration in front of the Presidential Office Building, the words on the banners read: “The 112th National Day of the Republic of China,” not Taiwan.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who was elected by the citizens of the Republic of China (ROC), made a speech at the podium. Taiwanese heroes and students performed the national anthem of the ROC. The ROC Air Force showed off its achievements in locally designed and produced jet trainers, the AT-5 Yung Ying (“Brave Eagle”), arranging for the aircraft to fly over the Presidential Office Building. A military honor guard also performed.
In her address, Tsai said that over the past seven years, all Taiwanese have contributed to building a highly resilient economy. Taiwan’s economy has become a key force in the restructuring of global supply chains. As a result, the ROC has become stronger. She also expressed her gratitude to Taiwanese for giving her two terms as president of the ROC.
During the ceremony, “the strength of the ROC” and “the president of the ROC” were mentioned several times. It was nothing but a celebration of the ROC’s national day.
On the other hand, the site of the old Presidential Palace in Nanjing, China, that Ma visited in March is an empty shell. That “Republic of China” was already eliminated by the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Ma could have voiced his disapproval, yet he remained silent.
A nation’s development should follow international trends. The “anti-China” trend of today came into being after countries around the world began seeing China as a threat.
In addition to Taiwan’s own freedom and democracy, as well as its capability in technology, it has been following this trend, and therefore gains support from other democracies.
For example, the US Congress has passed a bill to defend Taiwan’s international status, saying that UN Resolution 2758 (which recognizes the PRC as the sole legitimate government of China) does not apply to Taiwan.
In terms of its economy, Taiwan was not overly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Instead, the economy has grown further thanks to the government’s issuance of stimulus vouchers and cash, and the introduction of the TPass monthly mass public transportation program. Rental subsidies were also provided to help people in a practical way. These are the fruits of the joint efforts of Taiwanese.
All the above are built upon the autonomous political institutions and economic system of the ROC in Taiwan.
Taiwanese agree with Tsai’s “four commitments.” The commitment emphasizing that the ROC and the PRC should not be subordinate to each other has clearly defined that Taiwan and China are two separate national entities. The issue has never been a domestic one.
The ROC exists on Taiwanese soil and its outlying islands. Along with the changing international situation, the ROC has developed into a country different from the one that claimed 35 provinces across the Taiwan Strait. The people of the ROC have been growing and thriving in Taiwan. This is the reality. As a reserve lieutenant commander, I disagree with Ma’s reasoning for not attending the official Double Ten National Day ceremony.
Arthur Chang is a navy reserve lieutenant commander.
Translated by Emma Liu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS