The Ministry of Education this week repeatedly apologized for a video it released last month promoting the government’s “National Childcare Policy for Ages 0-6,” which had triggered strong reactions from anime, manga and figurine fans who said it disrespected people’s hobbies and preferences.
In the 30-second video, a married couple with their two young children visit the husband’s mother, whom he secretly hands some cash, asking her to pay the delivery person when the action figure he ordered arrives. She scornfully tells him: “What? Are you still playing with those figures?” In the next scene, she gleefully announces that she spent the money on “more meaningful” things for her grandchildren. The children are then shown holding educational books and toys.
The YouTube video racked up more than 4,000 dislikes, with comments saying it discriminates against people who enjoy manga, anime and video games, while discouraging people from wanting to get married and have children. The ministry on Saturday last week took the video down and apologized the next day.
The video was the latest in a series featuring similar themes. In one, after a woman says she wants to spend the money they are saving from a government childcare subsidy on an education savings fund, a child shouts that “daddy wants to buy a video game console.” In another, a woman describes her husband as her “third child,” after he excitedly says he wants to play with their son’s toy robot.
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) also stirred up fury among anime and manga fans with his preface in a new autobiographical manga titled Keep Promise (漫畫柯文哲), in which he wrote that manga seems to be for children, and only entertainment for adults, but does not address important matters. After the backlash, the book launch was postponed for a reprint, while Ko’s campaign office said it was not his intention to disrespect manga fans.
Many online commenters and legislators have criticized Ko and the ministry for showing ignorance and discrimination against anime and manga fans, and a general disdain for personal interests and hobbies. Local comic artists have said that many comics and manga that won the annual Golden Comic Awards were about “serious” matters such as same-sex relationships and environmental protection, yet the three ministry videos ridiculed a father’s interests in video games, robots and action figures.
Moreover, the videos showcased an outdated moral standard that is dogmatic and repressive — viewing certain forms of recreation as “childish” and “meaningless,” while stressing that “responsible” adults should hide or give up their interests that merely serve the purpose of enjoyment, and to instead prioritize “saving money,” “raising a family” and other “more important matters.”
The videos might have tried to resonate with young adults’ experiences, while Ko tried to draw support from young people by using a manga to express his political views, but their attitude of superiority and implicit moral condemnation only intensified the feelings of exclusion felt by adults with “nonmainstream” hobbies. The message appeared to be “I know what is best for you,” rather than the values of diversity, equity, inclusion and respect for individuality that the ministry should be encouraging.
To win over young adults, politicians and government agencies should first show respect for diversity and be willing to listen and learn about their situations and needs, rather than unilaterally deciding what is best for them. The importance of hobbies and individuality should be encouraged, as it is not only beneficial for physical, social, emotional and cognitive development in children, but also for maintaining overall well-being in adults.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of