The Ministry of Education this week repeatedly apologized for a video it released last month promoting the government’s “National Childcare Policy for Ages 0-6,” which had triggered strong reactions from anime, manga and figurine fans who said it disrespected people’s hobbies and preferences.
In the 30-second video, a married couple with their two young children visit the husband’s mother, whom he secretly hands some cash, asking her to pay the delivery person when the action figure he ordered arrives. She scornfully tells him: “What? Are you still playing with those figures?” In the next scene, she gleefully announces that she spent the money on “more meaningful” things for her grandchildren. The children are then shown holding educational books and toys.
The YouTube video racked up more than 4,000 dislikes, with comments saying it discriminates against people who enjoy manga, anime and video games, while discouraging people from wanting to get married and have children. The ministry on Saturday last week took the video down and apologized the next day.
The video was the latest in a series featuring similar themes. In one, after a woman says she wants to spend the money they are saving from a government childcare subsidy on an education savings fund, a child shouts that “daddy wants to buy a video game console.” In another, a woman describes her husband as her “third child,” after he excitedly says he wants to play with their son’s toy robot.
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) also stirred up fury among anime and manga fans with his preface in a new autobiographical manga titled Keep Promise (漫畫柯文哲), in which he wrote that manga seems to be for children, and only entertainment for adults, but does not address important matters. After the backlash, the book launch was postponed for a reprint, while Ko’s campaign office said it was not his intention to disrespect manga fans.
Many online commenters and legislators have criticized Ko and the ministry for showing ignorance and discrimination against anime and manga fans, and a general disdain for personal interests and hobbies. Local comic artists have said that many comics and manga that won the annual Golden Comic Awards were about “serious” matters such as same-sex relationships and environmental protection, yet the three ministry videos ridiculed a father’s interests in video games, robots and action figures.
Moreover, the videos showcased an outdated moral standard that is dogmatic and repressive — viewing certain forms of recreation as “childish” and “meaningless,” while stressing that “responsible” adults should hide or give up their interests that merely serve the purpose of enjoyment, and to instead prioritize “saving money,” “raising a family” and other “more important matters.”
The videos might have tried to resonate with young adults’ experiences, while Ko tried to draw support from young people by using a manga to express his political views, but their attitude of superiority and implicit moral condemnation only intensified the feelings of exclusion felt by adults with “nonmainstream” hobbies. The message appeared to be “I know what is best for you,” rather than the values of diversity, equity, inclusion and respect for individuality that the ministry should be encouraging.
To win over young adults, politicians and government agencies should first show respect for diversity and be willing to listen and learn about their situations and needs, rather than unilaterally deciding what is best for them. The importance of hobbies and individuality should be encouraged, as it is not only beneficial for physical, social, emotional and cognitive development in children, but also for maintaining overall well-being in adults.
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Following the BRICS summit held in Kazan, Russia, last month, media outlets circulated familiar narratives about Russia and China’s plans to dethrone the US dollar and build a BRICS-led global order. Each summit brings renewed buzz about a BRICS cross-border payment system designed to replace the SWIFT payment system, allowing members to trade without using US dollars. Articles often highlight the appeal of this concept to BRICS members — bypassing sanctions, reducing US dollar dependence and escaping US influence. They say that, if widely adopted, the US dollar could lose its global currency status. However, none of these articles provide
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
RSS