Rapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are boosting online disinformation and enabling governments to increase censorship and surveillance in a growing threat to human rights, a US non-profit said in a report published on Wednesday.
Global Internet freedom fell for the 13th consecutive year, with China, Myanmar and Iran having the worst conditions of the 70 countries surveyed by the Freedom on the Net report, which highlighted the risks posed by easy access to generative AI technology.
AI allows governments to “enhance and refine online censorship” and amplify digital repression, making surveillance, and the creation and spread of disinformation faster, cheaper, and more effective, the annual report by Freedom House said.
“AI can be used to supercharge censorship, surveillance, and the creation and spread of disinformation,” Freedom House president Michael Abramowitz said. “Advances in AI are amplifying a crisis for human rights online.”
By some estimates, AI-generated content could soon account for 99 percent or more of all information on the internet, overwhelming content moderation systems that are already struggling to keep up with the deluge of misinformation, tech experts say.
Governments have been slow to respond, with few countries passing legislation for the ethical use of AI, while also justifying the use of AI-based surveillance technologies, such as facial recognition, on the grounds of security.
Generative AI-based tools were used in at least 16 countries to distort information on political or social issues from June last year to May this year, the Freedom House report said, adding that the figure is likely an undercount.
Meanwhile, in at least 22 countries, social media companies were required to use automated systems for content moderation to comply with censorship rules.
With at least 65 national-level elections taking place next year, including in Indonesia, India and the US, misinformation can have major repercussions, with deepfakes already popping up from New Zealand to Turkey.
“Generative AI offers sophistication and scale to spread misinformation on a level that was previously unimaginable — it is a force multiplier of misinformation,” said Karen Rebelo, deputy editor at BOOM Live, a Mumbai-based fact-checking organization.
While AI is a “military-grade weapon in the hands of bad actors,” in India political parties and their proxies are the biggest spreaders of misinformation and disinformation, she said, and it is not in their interest to regulate AI.
While companies such as OpenAI and Google have imposed safeguards to reduce some overtly harmful uses of their AI-based chatbots, these can be easily breached, Freedom House said.
Even if deepfakes are quickly exposed, they can “undermine public trust in democratic processes, incentivize activists and journalists to self-censor, and drown out reliable and independent reporting,” the report said.
“AI-generated imagery ... can also entrench polarization and other existing tensions. In extreme cases, it could galvanize violence against individuals or whole communities,” it added.
For all its pitfalls, AI technology can be enormously beneficial, so long as governments regulate its use and enact strong data privacy laws, while also requiring better misinformation-detection tools and safeguards for human rights, the report said.
“When designed and deployed safely and fairly, AI can help people evade authoritarian censorship, counter disinformation, and document human rights abuses,” said Allie Funk, Freedom House’s research director for technology and democracy.
For example, AI is being increasingly used in fact checking and to analyze satellite imagery, social media posts and images to flag human rights abuses in conflict zones.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS