As the horrors of last weekend’s attack on Israel by Hamas unfolded, people all over the world frantically searched for accurate information.
If they thought they could find it on what used to be Twitter, they were quickly disillusioned.
“The site is quite literally a war zone,” is how NBC News reporter Ben Collins described what is now called X.
Search for Israel or Hamas and you will find yourself in a cesspool of deepfake images, video-game clips presented as real-time footage and straight-up lies.
In one case, an account that looked like the Jerusalem Post circulated the lie that the Israeli prime minister had been taken to the hospital, garnering hundreds of thousands of views. In another, a false claim went viral about Israel bombing a church in Gaza.
Wired magazine reported that users were shown a faked picture of Cristiano Ronaldo holding the Palestinian flag, and a three-year-old video from the Syrian civil war presented as if it had just happened.
There is accurate information mixed in, but it is increasingly hard to tell.
“Any truth is so decontextualized that you don’t even know,” Collins told me on Monday.
The trip to the social-media gutter has happened with lightning speed. Elon Musk completed his acquisition of Twitter for US$44bn a year ago this month amid predictions that the site would suffer on his impetuous watch.
IRRESPONSIBLE
The loss of what was an indispensable, if imperfect, social-media platform would be bad enough. What has made the situation worse is that Musk apparently has done it all on purpose or at least with reckless disregard for his responsibilities to the common good.
Two factors dominate the mess, and neither of them has happened by mistake. One is the matter of what gets promoted by the platform’s algorithms to monetize certain posts, such as the supposed church bombing.
Musk dismantled Twitter’s verification system, in which a check mark denoted a verified source, such as a prominent public figure or a news organization. That practice alone would have prevented the faked-up Jerusalem Post story from getting the traction it did.
Now the blue checks go to not to verified users, but to those who pay for them, including many bad actors. X’s algorithm sends those posts to the top of its feed, flooding the zone with garbage.
The other big change is the sharp decline in internal efforts to fact-check or verify information. Not long after buying Twitter, Musk got rid of most of the Twitter content-moderation staff that had tried to keep things as accurate as possible by flagging fake accounts and attaching warnings.
Then, in very recent months, according to the Information, Musk’s site stopped using a software tool used to identify organized misinformation.
The author and historian Ruth Ben-Ghiat reacted bluntly to that revelation: “Evil.”
Over the weekend, Musk added to the wartime chaos personally, urging his 150 million followers to heed two accounts notorious for spreading vile lies. He later deleted that post, but by then the damage was done.
The wisest users treat X with more skepticism than ever before, and with one eye on the door
There is an ethical issue here that shouldn’t be ignored.
“Social media companies, particularly those that style themselves forums for free speech, have a moral obligation to try to ensure the free flow of reliable information to desperate users facing mortal risk,” said Suzanne Nossel, chief executive of PenAmerica, which advocates for free expression.
Musk, she told me, has turned his back on that.
Bad as things are, they are likely to get worse.
SKEPTICAL EYE
As Hamas announced that it intends to begin killing civilian hostages and broadcasting executions in audio and video, Mother Jones editor-in-chief Clara Jeffery foresaw more trouble: “I want everyone to realize that Elon has set up his site so that these snuff videos will be monetized for his blue checks.”
Jeffery offered advice to users who want to stay on Twitter, for whatever reason, on how to avoid having those auto-playing videos shoved into their feeds.
For some, it still makes sense to stay on X because its critical mass of users, including historians, journalists and news outlets, is still there. However, the wisest do it with more skepticism than ever before, and with one eye on the door.
“Well, I think my time here is done,” posted Princeton history professor Kevin Kruse, whose insightful contributions amassed almost half a million followers on Twitter. “I’ve been telling myself for months that the good here outweighs the bad but I don’t believe that anymore.”
On Tuesday Kruse said that he would leave his account up, but would decamp to two other sites: Substack and Bluesky.
He is far from alone, and so the chaos grows.
Twitter’s accelerating demise is not, by any means, among the worst atrocities of the past week.
However, at a crucial time, it has managed to add to the world’s misery.
Margaret Sullivan is a Guardian US columnist writing on media, politics and culture.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s