Hsu Chih-hsin (許智信), a former “specialist” working for the Yilan County Government, absconded after allegations that he had fraudulently obtained NT$200 million (US$6.2 million) from 60 county residents.
His disappearance is politically inconvenient for Yilan County Commissioner Lin Zi-miao (林姿妙), with whom he is closely associated. Even though the Yilan County Government then dismissed Hsu on the pretext that he had been absent without leave for three days, this has been interpreted in the media as an attempt by the county government to deny any connection to an alleged fraudster.
Even though Hsu had failed to be elected, he had been recruited as a county government specialist purely because of his acquaintance with Lin’s daughter.
A specialist, however, should be a civil servant employed through official examinations and selections. Hsu was directly appointed by Lin to work in this position, and his responsibilities were completely unrelated to his official position.
Instead, he served as Lin’s private and political assistant in local campaigns, arranging her schedule and organizing campaign events.
A civil servant dared to sail under false colors in the county government and be recognized as the commissioner’s hand; it is clear that he had Lin’s full blessing.
It is not unusual for low-ranking civil servants to be seen side-by-side with high-ranking political candidates, especially during elections.
This generally has political implications: Should the candidate win, their supporters can expect a promotion as well. You can take that for what it is.
In that case, Hsu was just one of many sycophants in the political system. He volunteered to be a servile “yes-man” for Lin out of his desire for assistance from Lin, a superior political actor.
However, a superior must be highly disciplined and strict with managing the subordinates, or these yes-men might cause them big trouble.
Back to Hsu’s fraud issue: Victims were willing to lend money because they regarded Hsu as being affiliated with Lin. Now that Hsu has apparently absconded with the money, the issue has caused a stir in Yilan County.
The county government, especially the county commissioner, closely associated with the swindler, claimed they had no idea about the scam. This is hard to believe.
A responsible government must look out for residents, but the Yilan County Government appears in this case to be throwing up its hands and saying it had no idea what had happened.
Yilan County Government officials, and even the commissioner herself, have been in deep water due to scandals and corruption ever since Lin took office.
Those suspected officials have resigned or transferred to other positions once reported, and that shows Lin always found ways to avoid any responsibility, raising serious concerns about her ability to maintain control over the county government.
Likewise, Hsu’s dismissal was merely to help Lin divest herself of the connection with fraud and to convince the public of her innocence.
Former Yilan county commissioner Chen Ding-nan (陳定南) had good self-discipline and management of the county government. Nobody accused Chen of corruption or connection with financial scams.
Politicians must bear in mind that reputation and trust require a responsible attitude, and a lack of self-discipline leads to a lack of trust.
Chang Hsun-ching is a former librarian.
Translated by Hsieh Yi-ching
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS