Hsu Chih-hsin (許智信), a former “specialist” working for the Yilan County Government, absconded after allegations that he had fraudulently obtained NT$200 million (US$6.2 million) from 60 county residents.
His disappearance is politically inconvenient for Yilan County Commissioner Lin Zi-miao (林姿妙), with whom he is closely associated. Even though the Yilan County Government then dismissed Hsu on the pretext that he had been absent without leave for three days, this has been interpreted in the media as an attempt by the county government to deny any connection to an alleged fraudster.
Even though Hsu had failed to be elected, he had been recruited as a county government specialist purely because of his acquaintance with Lin’s daughter.
A specialist, however, should be a civil servant employed through official examinations and selections. Hsu was directly appointed by Lin to work in this position, and his responsibilities were completely unrelated to his official position.
Instead, he served as Lin’s private and political assistant in local campaigns, arranging her schedule and organizing campaign events.
A civil servant dared to sail under false colors in the county government and be recognized as the commissioner’s hand; it is clear that he had Lin’s full blessing.
It is not unusual for low-ranking civil servants to be seen side-by-side with high-ranking political candidates, especially during elections.
This generally has political implications: Should the candidate win, their supporters can expect a promotion as well. You can take that for what it is.
In that case, Hsu was just one of many sycophants in the political system. He volunteered to be a servile “yes-man” for Lin out of his desire for assistance from Lin, a superior political actor.
However, a superior must be highly disciplined and strict with managing the subordinates, or these yes-men might cause them big trouble.
Back to Hsu’s fraud issue: Victims were willing to lend money because they regarded Hsu as being affiliated with Lin. Now that Hsu has apparently absconded with the money, the issue has caused a stir in Yilan County.
The county government, especially the county commissioner, closely associated with the swindler, claimed they had no idea about the scam. This is hard to believe.
A responsible government must look out for residents, but the Yilan County Government appears in this case to be throwing up its hands and saying it had no idea what had happened.
Yilan County Government officials, and even the commissioner herself, have been in deep water due to scandals and corruption ever since Lin took office.
Those suspected officials have resigned or transferred to other positions once reported, and that shows Lin always found ways to avoid any responsibility, raising serious concerns about her ability to maintain control over the county government.
Likewise, Hsu’s dismissal was merely to help Lin divest herself of the connection with fraud and to convince the public of her innocence.
Former Yilan county commissioner Chen Ding-nan (陳定南) had good self-discipline and management of the county government. Nobody accused Chen of corruption or connection with financial scams.
Politicians must bear in mind that reputation and trust require a responsible attitude, and a lack of self-discipline leads to a lack of trust.
Chang Hsun-ching is a former librarian.
Translated by Hsieh Yi-ching
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS