Hsu Chih-hsin (許智信), a former “specialist” working for the Yilan County Government, absconded after allegations that he had fraudulently obtained NT$200 million (US$6.2 million) from 60 county residents.
His disappearance is politically inconvenient for Yilan County Commissioner Lin Zi-miao (林姿妙), with whom he is closely associated. Even though the Yilan County Government then dismissed Hsu on the pretext that he had been absent without leave for three days, this has been interpreted in the media as an attempt by the county government to deny any connection to an alleged fraudster.
Even though Hsu had failed to be elected, he had been recruited as a county government specialist purely because of his acquaintance with Lin’s daughter.
A specialist, however, should be a civil servant employed through official examinations and selections. Hsu was directly appointed by Lin to work in this position, and his responsibilities were completely unrelated to his official position.
Instead, he served as Lin’s private and political assistant in local campaigns, arranging her schedule and organizing campaign events.
A civil servant dared to sail under false colors in the county government and be recognized as the commissioner’s hand; it is clear that he had Lin’s full blessing.
It is not unusual for low-ranking civil servants to be seen side-by-side with high-ranking political candidates, especially during elections.
This generally has political implications: Should the candidate win, their supporters can expect a promotion as well. You can take that for what it is.
In that case, Hsu was just one of many sycophants in the political system. He volunteered to be a servile “yes-man” for Lin out of his desire for assistance from Lin, a superior political actor.
However, a superior must be highly disciplined and strict with managing the subordinates, or these yes-men might cause them big trouble.
Back to Hsu’s fraud issue: Victims were willing to lend money because they regarded Hsu as being affiliated with Lin. Now that Hsu has apparently absconded with the money, the issue has caused a stir in Yilan County.
The county government, especially the county commissioner, closely associated with the swindler, claimed they had no idea about the scam. This is hard to believe.
A responsible government must look out for residents, but the Yilan County Government appears in this case to be throwing up its hands and saying it had no idea what had happened.
Yilan County Government officials, and even the commissioner herself, have been in deep water due to scandals and corruption ever since Lin took office.
Those suspected officials have resigned or transferred to other positions once reported, and that shows Lin always found ways to avoid any responsibility, raising serious concerns about her ability to maintain control over the county government.
Likewise, Hsu’s dismissal was merely to help Lin divest herself of the connection with fraud and to convince the public of her innocence.
Former Yilan county commissioner Chen Ding-nan (陳定南) had good self-discipline and management of the county government. Nobody accused Chen of corruption or connection with financial scams.
Politicians must bear in mind that reputation and trust require a responsible attitude, and a lack of self-discipline leads to a lack of trust.
Chang Hsun-ching is a former librarian.
Translated by Hsieh Yi-ching
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS