Following a factory blaze in Pingtung County on Sept. 22 that killed 10 people and injured more than 100, the Ministry of Justice, hoping to prevent imbalanced criminal liability, announced a draft amendment to Article 276 of the Criminal Code to increase the penalty for negligent homicide.
“Those who commit the crime in the preceding paragraph, depending on the severity of the circumstances and consequences, shall be sentenced to a minimum of one year or a maximum of seven years in prison. If the circumstances are serious and more than three people are killed as a result, they shall be sentenced to prison for a minimum of three years or a maximum of 10,” the proposed amendment says.
The proposal has been backed by many legislators in the hope that the third reading of the amendment bill would be completed as soon as possible.
Lee Yi-hsiang (李義祥), the main suspect in the derailment of the Taiwan Railways Administration’s (TRA) Taroko Express in April 2, 2021, which killed 49 people and injured more than 200, was sentenced to only five years in prison, the maximum penalty for negligent homicide, raising public concerns about the punishment not fitting the crime.
The sentence was decided based on provisions in the Criminal Code that the perpetrator of ideal concurrence offenses, where two or more punishments apply to a crime, only the punishment for the most offensive act shall be imposed, despite that one single act violating the legal rights of multiple lives and persons.
The Ministry of Justice took action quickly and sent a letter to the Legislative Yuan for review in May 2021, recommending an amendment to the crimes of negligent homicide and obstruction of transportation in the Criminal Code.
However, the proposal was strongly opposed by some legal academics at a public hearing, who said the requirements for “serious circumstances” were unclear, and that there is no legitimate basis for the “three people” in the aggravated felony provision of causing three or more deaths.
The proposed amendment has yet to be scheduled for review at the Legislative Yuan after two years.
There have recently been frequent cases of heavy casualties caused by single accidents, such as the fatal 2018 derailment of a Puyuma Express train that killed 18 people, the fatal accident in May of a crane boom falling 31 stories onto the tracks of the Taichung MRT, and the incident in July in which a female student from National Chengchi University was killed by an air-conditioner unit that fell from the 17th floor of a building as she was waiting at a bus stop.
For cases of a perpetrator or one act causing multiple casualties, or carelessness and negligence during construction work causing a fatality, the heaviest sentence, according to the current Criminal Code, is only five years of imprisonment.
The Criminal Code has lost its normative integrity here, and there are obvious legal loopholes. It is necessary to amend the law as soon as possible to reduce the risk of accidents.
Both the German and Japanese criminal codes have provisions that increase the penalty for gross negligence, in view of the actor’s violation of a particularly important duty of care, especially the high possibility of damage caused by neglect. The legislation means that the actor of such crimes should be more conscience-stricken, thus the increased legal penalty.
The amendment proposed by the Ministry of Justice follows the legal principles found in the German and Japanese criminal codes, and adds provisions on “gross negligence,” which is laudable.
The Criminal Code is the law most closely related to people’s lives. With the rapid changes and development of criminal methods and the tools available to them, it must be ready for amendment at any time, otherwise the law would not meet actual needs.
Since its comprehensive revision in 2005, the Criminal Code has rarely been significantly revised, causing it to fall behind technological developments and unable to meet real needs.
I hope that this tragic fire would drive legislators to review and amend the outdated relevant provisions in the Criminal Code as soon as possible to reassure the public and make those who lost their lives in this fire not die in vain.
Chao Hsuey-wen is an assistant professor and holds a doctorate in law from Fu Jen Catholic University.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s