There has been extensive discussion recently about Cheng Da bookstore’s decision to close all of its branches.
Now, with the ongoing campaigns for the Taiwanese presidential election, I hope that every candidate could pay attention to books, promote reading and provide a boost to both publishers and booksellers.
In a recent trip to South Korea, I, along with several members of the Taipei Book Fair Foundation, learned something about the state of the country’s publishing industry and the effectiveness of its fixed book pricing system.
During a visit to the Korean Publishers Society (KOPUS), the publishers mentioned an interesting campaign, “I Want to See the President’s Love of Reading,” which was launched during the country’s presidential election in 2017.
The campaign’s organizers hoped that the presidential candidates, by purchasing and reading books, could set an example for the public to follow, while generating policies favoring the publishing industry and thinking of ways to elevate reading culture more broadly.
Previously, in an effort to provide book recommendations and stimulate discussion, KOPUS and the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy had together launched “Book Lovers of Parliament,” a recurring event that ran from 2013 to 2015.
Each iteration saw authors, members of parliament and government authorities invited to participate in conversations designed to increase parliamentary awareness of reading and culture-related issues. Sixty members of parliament participated in the monthly event, which was repeated 16 times over the two years.
In 2014, after 10 years of development, South Korea implemented a fixed book pricing system, and the policies have now been in effect for the better part of a decade.
According to this system, books are generally not discounted within the first 18 months of publication. At most, they are discounted by 10 percent against the recommended retail price; if freebies or other incentives are included in a promotion, the additional discount is limited to 5 percent.
After the 18-month period has passed, prices can be reduced, but this requires a reprint, a change in the book’s ISBN or that a new list-price sticker be attached to the book. However, the maximum discount rate remains unchanged.
The fixed book pricing system was accompanied by a coordinated set of measures, including the establishment of a supervisory board responsible for inspecting violations and ensuring reasonable prices.
These measures caution readers that price wars only encourage inflated pricing and remind them that discounted prices do not always represent the best deals, as seen in Taiwan, about four decades ago, when eyeglasses and chandeliers were initially priced exorbitantly and then subjected to heavy discounts that at times approached 70 percent or 80 percent. Having a clear and fixed pricing can spare consumers the trouble of comparing fluctuating prices, allowing publishers to focus on quality over quantity, instead of engaging in cutthroat pricing.
The implementation of the fixed book pricing system led to an increase in annual book sales in South Korea from 2018 to 2020, and the nation’s three major channels, Kyobo, Yes24 and Aladin, saw their combined revenue increase from US$1.07 billion to US$1.32 billion per year. In addition, about US$3 billion in sales was generated in the e-book market.
Elsewhere in the industry, the number of independent bookstores trended upward: In 2015, there were only 97 independent bookstores in operation across the country; by 2020, this number had increased to 634.
According to the 2020 KOPUS survey of 1,001 bookstores and publishing companies, 67.3 percent of bookstore and publishing company owners were overall satisfied with the system and believed it benefited the entire industry. Happily, the Constitutional Court of Korea recently confirmed its legal validity.
Former US president Barack Obama is well-known for being an avid reader, and many are curious to learn which books line his shelves. Julianne Buonocore, moderator of The Literary Lifestyle blog, said that her community eagerly anticipates Obama’s much-publicized annual picks.
With Taiwan’s presidential election in full swing, one can imagine candidates browsing independent bookstores, grabbing some titles and sharing their literary loves. Would that not be great? So simple a gesture could provide a significant lift to publishers and booksellers, while representing a refreshing change from the usual political tit for tat and squabbling.
Jerome C. Su is the chair of Bookman Books Ltd and an adjunct associate professor at the Graduate Institute of Translation and Interpretation at National Taiwan Normal University.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS