There has been extensive discussion recently about Cheng Da bookstore’s decision to close all of its branches.
Now, with the ongoing campaigns for the Taiwanese presidential election, I hope that every candidate could pay attention to books, promote reading and provide a boost to both publishers and booksellers.
In a recent trip to South Korea, I, along with several members of the Taipei Book Fair Foundation, learned something about the state of the country’s publishing industry and the effectiveness of its fixed book pricing system.
During a visit to the Korean Publishers Society (KOPUS), the publishers mentioned an interesting campaign, “I Want to See the President’s Love of Reading,” which was launched during the country’s presidential election in 2017.
The campaign’s organizers hoped that the presidential candidates, by purchasing and reading books, could set an example for the public to follow, while generating policies favoring the publishing industry and thinking of ways to elevate reading culture more broadly.
Previously, in an effort to provide book recommendations and stimulate discussion, KOPUS and the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy had together launched “Book Lovers of Parliament,” a recurring event that ran from 2013 to 2015.
Each iteration saw authors, members of parliament and government authorities invited to participate in conversations designed to increase parliamentary awareness of reading and culture-related issues. Sixty members of parliament participated in the monthly event, which was repeated 16 times over the two years.
In 2014, after 10 years of development, South Korea implemented a fixed book pricing system, and the policies have now been in effect for the better part of a decade.
According to this system, books are generally not discounted within the first 18 months of publication. At most, they are discounted by 10 percent against the recommended retail price; if freebies or other incentives are included in a promotion, the additional discount is limited to 5 percent.
After the 18-month period has passed, prices can be reduced, but this requires a reprint, a change in the book’s ISBN or that a new list-price sticker be attached to the book. However, the maximum discount rate remains unchanged.
The fixed book pricing system was accompanied by a coordinated set of measures, including the establishment of a supervisory board responsible for inspecting violations and ensuring reasonable prices.
These measures caution readers that price wars only encourage inflated pricing and remind them that discounted prices do not always represent the best deals, as seen in Taiwan, about four decades ago, when eyeglasses and chandeliers were initially priced exorbitantly and then subjected to heavy discounts that at times approached 70 percent or 80 percent. Having a clear and fixed pricing can spare consumers the trouble of comparing fluctuating prices, allowing publishers to focus on quality over quantity, instead of engaging in cutthroat pricing.
The implementation of the fixed book pricing system led to an increase in annual book sales in South Korea from 2018 to 2020, and the nation’s three major channels, Kyobo, Yes24 and Aladin, saw their combined revenue increase from US$1.07 billion to US$1.32 billion per year. In addition, about US$3 billion in sales was generated in the e-book market.
Elsewhere in the industry, the number of independent bookstores trended upward: In 2015, there were only 97 independent bookstores in operation across the country; by 2020, this number had increased to 634.
According to the 2020 KOPUS survey of 1,001 bookstores and publishing companies, 67.3 percent of bookstore and publishing company owners were overall satisfied with the system and believed it benefited the entire industry. Happily, the Constitutional Court of Korea recently confirmed its legal validity.
Former US president Barack Obama is well-known for being an avid reader, and many are curious to learn which books line his shelves. Julianne Buonocore, moderator of The Literary Lifestyle blog, said that her community eagerly anticipates Obama’s much-publicized annual picks.
With Taiwan’s presidential election in full swing, one can imagine candidates browsing independent bookstores, grabbing some titles and sharing their literary loves. Would that not be great? So simple a gesture could provide a significant lift to publishers and booksellers, while representing a refreshing change from the usual political tit for tat and squabbling.
Jerome C. Su is the chair of Bookman Books Ltd and an adjunct associate professor at the Graduate Institute of Translation and Interpretation at National Taiwan Normal University.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS