The weak link of Taiwan’s microchip industry is migrant labor.
Taiwan is a linchpin of the semiconductor industry, with microchip manufacturing making up 15 percent of its overall GDP. The chip industry is also a key domestic security concern, as Taiwan is one of the few places with the capacity to produce the most advanced chips. Taiwanese firms supply both US and Chinese companies with microchips that power devices from smartphones to spaceships.
However, little attention is given to the migrant labor that underpins the industry. There are approximately 700,000 migrant workers in Taiwan. Most of them come from Southeast Asian countries, including Indonesia (35.36 percent), Vietnam (35.05 percent), the Philippines (21.17 percent) and Thailand (8.42 percent). Sixty percent of them work in the manufacturing industry.
Concerns about the exploitation of foreign workers is a sticking point in the government’s New Southbound Policy, which aims to strengthen ties between Taiwan and Southeast Asia.
Centered in Taoyuan and Kaohsiung, the high rate of microchip production is supported by factories operating 24 hours. It is mainly migrant workers who take undesirable afternoon to midnight and graveyard shifts, says Intelligence Manpower, a recruitment agency based in Taipei.
Taoyuan is an industrial city in the north dominated by factories that employ migrant workers, the international airport and not much else. It has many dormitories where migrant workers live together in four-bunk-bed rooms which have been found to house more than 30 people.
One testimonial from a factory worker in Taoyuan detailed that the penalty for returning one hour after curfew was a fine of 1.5 days’ base wage and up to two weeks’ pay for staying out overnight. Smoking, drinking or being noisy are other infringements that can be punished with fines or even deportation.
In 2021, due to rising COVID-19 infections in Taiwan, measures were introduced that barred migrant workers living in dorms from being outside for more than three hours per week. This rule applied only to migrant workers.
There have been company-specific and industrywide protests every few years in Taiwan. In 2018, there were protests for better working conditions and fair pay where workers held smartphones and signs that read “we were shipped to Taiwan to make this” and “we were enslaved in Taiwan to make this.”
In 2020, there was consternation from workers after Taiwanese electronic components producer Compal made illegal and arbitrary pay cuts. Last year workers protested for the right to change employers if they wish to.
About 881 migrant workers died or were injured at work from 2017 to 2019 — an average of almost one per day, Ministry of Labor data showed.
Government statistics indicate that migrants working in the manufacturing industry were at about twice the risk of workplace injury compared with local workers.
Taiwan could use concerns over migrant workers “as leverage to get support from countries in Southeast Asia to give tougher statements against Beijing of the dangers or impacts of war on migrant workers,” said Ratih Kabinawa, a doctoral candidate at the University of Western Australia who researches Taiwan’s relations with Southeast Asia.
No matter how the chips fall, Southeast Asia is intertwined with Taiwan’s microchip industry and US-China geopolitics. Improving labor practices has been slow going, but shoring up political allies would be a matter of domestic security and geopolitical stability. As it stands, Taiwan remains dependent on migrant workers to support its most important industry.
Cherish Tay is a law graduate, New Colombo Plan scholar and writer from Australia currently living and studying in Taipei.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then