The weak link of Taiwan’s microchip industry is migrant labor.
Taiwan is a linchpin of the semiconductor industry, with microchip manufacturing making up 15 percent of its overall GDP. The chip industry is also a key domestic security concern, as Taiwan is one of the few places with the capacity to produce the most advanced chips. Taiwanese firms supply both US and Chinese companies with microchips that power devices from smartphones to spaceships.
However, little attention is given to the migrant labor that underpins the industry. There are approximately 700,000 migrant workers in Taiwan. Most of them come from Southeast Asian countries, including Indonesia (35.36 percent), Vietnam (35.05 percent), the Philippines (21.17 percent) and Thailand (8.42 percent). Sixty percent of them work in the manufacturing industry.
Concerns about the exploitation of foreign workers is a sticking point in the government’s New Southbound Policy, which aims to strengthen ties between Taiwan and Southeast Asia.
Centered in Taoyuan and Kaohsiung, the high rate of microchip production is supported by factories operating 24 hours. It is mainly migrant workers who take undesirable afternoon to midnight and graveyard shifts, says Intelligence Manpower, a recruitment agency based in Taipei.
Taoyuan is an industrial city in the north dominated by factories that employ migrant workers, the international airport and not much else. It has many dormitories where migrant workers live together in four-bunk-bed rooms which have been found to house more than 30 people.
One testimonial from a factory worker in Taoyuan detailed that the penalty for returning one hour after curfew was a fine of 1.5 days’ base wage and up to two weeks’ pay for staying out overnight. Smoking, drinking or being noisy are other infringements that can be punished with fines or even deportation.
In 2021, due to rising COVID-19 infections in Taiwan, measures were introduced that barred migrant workers living in dorms from being outside for more than three hours per week. This rule applied only to migrant workers.
There have been company-specific and industrywide protests every few years in Taiwan. In 2018, there were protests for better working conditions and fair pay where workers held smartphones and signs that read “we were shipped to Taiwan to make this” and “we were enslaved in Taiwan to make this.”
In 2020, there was consternation from workers after Taiwanese electronic components producer Compal made illegal and arbitrary pay cuts. Last year workers protested for the right to change employers if they wish to.
About 881 migrant workers died or were injured at work from 2017 to 2019 — an average of almost one per day, Ministry of Labor data showed.
Government statistics indicate that migrants working in the manufacturing industry were at about twice the risk of workplace injury compared with local workers.
Taiwan could use concerns over migrant workers “as leverage to get support from countries in Southeast Asia to give tougher statements against Beijing of the dangers or impacts of war on migrant workers,” said Ratih Kabinawa, a doctoral candidate at the University of Western Australia who researches Taiwan’s relations with Southeast Asia.
No matter how the chips fall, Southeast Asia is intertwined with Taiwan’s microchip industry and US-China geopolitics. Improving labor practices has been slow going, but shoring up political allies would be a matter of domestic security and geopolitical stability. As it stands, Taiwan remains dependent on migrant workers to support its most important industry.
Cherish Tay is a law graduate, New Colombo Plan scholar and writer from Australia currently living and studying in Taipei.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS