The weak link of Taiwan’s microchip industry is migrant labor.
Taiwan is a linchpin of the semiconductor industry, with microchip manufacturing making up 15 percent of its overall GDP. The chip industry is also a key domestic security concern, as Taiwan is one of the few places with the capacity to produce the most advanced chips. Taiwanese firms supply both US and Chinese companies with microchips that power devices from smartphones to spaceships.
However, little attention is given to the migrant labor that underpins the industry. There are approximately 700,000 migrant workers in Taiwan. Most of them come from Southeast Asian countries, including Indonesia (35.36 percent), Vietnam (35.05 percent), the Philippines (21.17 percent) and Thailand (8.42 percent). Sixty percent of them work in the manufacturing industry.
Concerns about the exploitation of foreign workers is a sticking point in the government’s New Southbound Policy, which aims to strengthen ties between Taiwan and Southeast Asia.
Centered in Taoyuan and Kaohsiung, the high rate of microchip production is supported by factories operating 24 hours. It is mainly migrant workers who take undesirable afternoon to midnight and graveyard shifts, says Intelligence Manpower, a recruitment agency based in Taipei.
Taoyuan is an industrial city in the north dominated by factories that employ migrant workers, the international airport and not much else. It has many dormitories where migrant workers live together in four-bunk-bed rooms which have been found to house more than 30 people.
One testimonial from a factory worker in Taoyuan detailed that the penalty for returning one hour after curfew was a fine of 1.5 days’ base wage and up to two weeks’ pay for staying out overnight. Smoking, drinking or being noisy are other infringements that can be punished with fines or even deportation.
In 2021, due to rising COVID-19 infections in Taiwan, measures were introduced that barred migrant workers living in dorms from being outside for more than three hours per week. This rule applied only to migrant workers.
There have been company-specific and industrywide protests every few years in Taiwan. In 2018, there were protests for better working conditions and fair pay where workers held smartphones and signs that read “we were shipped to Taiwan to make this” and “we were enslaved in Taiwan to make this.”
In 2020, there was consternation from workers after Taiwanese electronic components producer Compal made illegal and arbitrary pay cuts. Last year workers protested for the right to change employers if they wish to.
About 881 migrant workers died or were injured at work from 2017 to 2019 — an average of almost one per day, Ministry of Labor data showed.
Government statistics indicate that migrants working in the manufacturing industry were at about twice the risk of workplace injury compared with local workers.
Taiwan could use concerns over migrant workers “as leverage to get support from countries in Southeast Asia to give tougher statements against Beijing of the dangers or impacts of war on migrant workers,” said Ratih Kabinawa, a doctoral candidate at the University of Western Australia who researches Taiwan’s relations with Southeast Asia.
No matter how the chips fall, Southeast Asia is intertwined with Taiwan’s microchip industry and US-China geopolitics. Improving labor practices has been slow going, but shoring up political allies would be a matter of domestic security and geopolitical stability. As it stands, Taiwan remains dependent on migrant workers to support its most important industry.
Cherish Tay is a law graduate, New Colombo Plan scholar and writer from Australia currently living and studying in Taipei.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS