Amid increasing concerns over China’s global rise, the EU has demonstrated its resolution to bolster economic security with the European Commission’s Chips Act, a list of 10 critical technologies crucial to economic security and an investigation into subsidies for imports of battery electric vehicles from China.
Like the US, Japan and other like-minded areas, the EU is wary of China’s advanced technological development and has implemented de-risking strategies.
Western countries have adopted countermeasures to slow China’s progress. They have prevented advanced technologies from military and civilian use in China, and have been pouring resources into the digital and green industries, as well as identifying flaws in their own systems and diversifying.
Then there are passive retaliatory measures, including tariffs and market restrictions imposed on rivals.
With shifts in the geopolitical landscape such as the Ukraine war, the partnership of Russia and China, and the escalating US-China rivalry, the EU has realized it can no longer afford to sit on the fence.
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill, the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors and Science Act and Inflation Reduction Act governing 21st-century climate and resources technologies were apparently introduced by the US to bolster the green industry.
In addition, US President Joe Biden’s plans to tighten export curbs for artificial intelligence (AI) chips to China starting this month aims to cut it off from key technologies that can support its military.
Similarly, the EU’s risk assessment report could lower the risk of an outflow of its advanced semiconductor, AI, quantum and biological technologies to rival countries.
The EU has also moved to partner with allies to form closer collaborative ties and de-risk value chains.
The US’ share of global GDP is about 20 percent. It knows that only by teaming up with major allies such as the EU, Asian countries such as Japan, South Korea and Indonesia, and Australia can it reach 50 to 60 percent.
To do so, it must align its goals with its allies.
There are lessons that Taiwan can learn from this:
First, there should be massive investment and tight controls over core technologies developed in advanced technological areas.
Second, it should keep in mind that the EU and the US need trusted partners to build value chains by implementing de-risking strategies for national security.
Third, precautionary and preventive measures can only take effect when allies partner across several fields.
Fourth, the nation should protect its strategically advantageous industries.
As Western countries have gone out of their way to investigate subsidies on imports and impose penalties, Taipei should likewise publish a list of critical technologies that concern national interests and plan a well-rounded economic security strategy by increasing investment and seek opportunities to participate in the de-risking value chain network.
Chang Meng-jen is chair of the Department of Italian Language and Culture at Fu Jen Catholic University, and coordinator of the university’s diplomacy and international affairs program.
Translated by Rita Wang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS